Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25539084›Full record

ArticleNature2015

Tel1(ATM)-mediated interference suppresses clustered meiotic double-strand-break formation.

Valerie Garcia, Stephen Gray, Rachal M Allison, Tim J Cooper, Matthew J Neale

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valerie GarciaGenome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RQ, UK.
Stephen GrayGenome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RQ, UK.
Rachal M AllisonGenome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RQ, UK.
Tim J CooperGenome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RQ, UK.
Matthew J NealeGenome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RQ, UK.
University of Sussex · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiotic recombination is a critical step in gametogenesis for many organisms, enabling the creation of genetically diverse haploid gametes. In each meiotic cell, recombination is initiated by numerous DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) created by Spo11, the evolutionarily conserved topoisomerase-like protein, but how these DSBs are distributed relatively uniformly across the four chromatids that make up each chromosome pair is poorly understood. Here we employ Saccharomyces cerevisiae to demonstrate distance-dependent DSB interference in cis (in which the occurrence of a DSB suppresses adjacent DSB formation)--a process that is mediated by the conserved DNA damage response kinase, Tel1(ATM). The inhibitory function of Tel1 acts on a relatively local scale, while over large distances DSBs have a tendency to form independently of one another even in the presence of Tel1. Notably, over very short distances, loss of Tel1 activity causes DSBs to cluster within discrete zones of concerted DSB activity. Our observations support a hierarchical view of recombination initiation where Tel1(ATM) prevents clusters of DSBs, and further suppresses DSBs within the surrounding chromosomal region. Such collective negative regulation will help to ensure that recombination events are dispersed evenly and arranged optimally for genetic exchange and efficient chromosome segregation.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded3-Isopropylmalate DehydrogenaseAlcohol OxidoreductasesAminohydrolasesChromatinChromosomes, FungalEndodeoxyribonucleasesGenes, FungalHomologous RecombinationIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMeiosisMeiotic Recombination Protein SPO11Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesPyrophosphatasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins3-Isopropylmalate DehydrogenaseAlcohol OxidoreductasesAminohydrolasesChromatinEndodeoxyribonucleasesHIS4 protein, S cerevisiaeIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLEU2 protein, S cerevisiaeMeiotic Recombination Protein SPO11Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesPyrophosphatasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSpo11 protein, S cerevisiaeTEL1 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID25539084
PMCPMC7116500
OpenAlexW2059678074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.