ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2014
Improving collaboration by standardization efforts in systems biology.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-scale metabolic model ofmSystems · 2025Article
- Towards a comprehensive assessment of QSP models: what would it take?Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024Review
- Teaching computational systems biology with an eye on quantitative systems pharmacology at the undergraduate level: Why do it, who would take it, and what should we teach?Frontiers in systems biology · 2022Article
- Publishing reproducible dynamic kinetic models.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- The Minimum Information about a Molecular Interaction CAusal STatement (MI2CAST).Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Evaluating accessibility, usability and interoperability of genome-scale metabolic models for diverse yeasts species.FEMS yeast research · 2021Article
- Finding new edges: systems approaches to MTOR signaling.Biochemical Society transactions · 2021Review
- Assembling Disease Networks From Causal Interaction Resources.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- High-Quality Genome-Scale Reconstruction ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Community standards to facilitate development and address challenges in metabolic modeling.Molecular systems biology · 2020Article
- SBML Level 3: an extensible format for the exchange and reuse of biological models.Molecular systems biology · 2020Review
- SLIMEr: probing flexibility of lipid metabolism in yeast with an improved constraint-based modeling framework.BMC systems biology · 2019Article
- Enumerating all possible biosynthetic pathways in metabolic networks.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Modeling of the jasmonate signaling pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana with respect to pathophysiology of Alternaria blight in Brassica.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- MAGPIE: Simplifying access and execution of computational models in the life sciences.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Harnessing Big Data for Systems Pharmacology.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2017Review
- Stoichiometric Representation of Gene-Protein-Reaction Associations Leverages Constraint-Based Analysis from Reaction to Gene-Level Phenotype Prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Guidelines for Reproducibly Building and Simulating Systems Biology Models.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2016Article
- Metabolic modeling with Big Data and the gut microbiome.Applied & translational genomics · 2016Review
- Quantitative Systems Pharmacology: A Framework for Context.Current pharmacology reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Collaborative genome-scale reconstruction endeavors of metabolic networks would not be possible without a common, standardized formal representation of these systems. The ability to precisely define biological building blocks together with their dynamic behavior has even been considered a prerequisite for upcoming synthetic biology approaches. Driven by the requirements of such ambitious research goals, standardization itself has become an active field of research on nearly all levels of granularity in biology. In addition to the originally envisaged exchange of computational models and tool interoperability, new standards have been suggested for an unambiguous graphical display of biological phenomena, to annotate, archive, as well as to rank models, and to describe execution and the outcomes of simulation experiments. The spectrum now even covers the interaction of entire neurons in the brain, three-dimensional motions, and the description of pharmacometric studies. Thereby, the mathematical description of systems and approaches for their (repeated) simulation are clearly separated from each other and also from their graphical representation. Minimum information definitions constitute guidelines and common operation protocols in order to ensure reproducibility of findings and a unified knowledge representation. Central database infrastructures have been established that provide the scientific community with persistent links from model annotations to online resources. A rich variety of open-source software tools thrives for all data formats, often supporting a multitude of programing languages. Regular meetings and workshops of developers and users lead to continuous improvement and ongoing development of these standardization efforts. This article gives a brief overview about the current state of the growing number of operation protocols, mark-up languages, graphical descriptions, and fundamental software support with relevance to systems biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.