ReviewIndian journal of endocrinology and metabolism2014
Hand X-ray in pediatric endocrinology: Skeletal age assessment and beyond.
Review in Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of Pubertal Status on Self-Regulation of Behavior and Executive Functions-A Systematic Review.Developmental psychobiology · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical practice recommendations for growth hormone treatment in children with chronic kidney disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2019Guideline
- Comparative study of the performance of two versions of the same AI tool for pediatric skeletal maturation assessment.European radiology · 2026Article
- Methods of skeletal age assessment using hand and wrist radiographs in children and their applicability across different ethnicities: systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- A comparative study of the interpretation results of different artificial intelligence bone age assessment software.Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM · 2026Article
- digiBONE: an automated tool for segmental Greulich-Pyle bone age assessment of Indian children and adolescents.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Automated bone age assessment in rare pediatric growth disorders: a comparative study using Deeplasia.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- An Artificial Intelligence System for Staging the Spheno-Occipital Synchondrosis.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2025Article
- Population-specific calibration and validation of an open-source bone age AI.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Growth Prediction in Orthodontics: ASystematic Review of Past Methods up to Artificial Intelligence.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Validation of an AI-Powered Automated X-ray Bone Age Analyzer in Chinese Children and Adolescents: A Comparison with the Tanner-Whitehouse 3 Method.Advances in therapy · 2024Article
- Optimizing calibration of modern skeletal maturity systems.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Association between sex hormones and bone age in boys aged 9-18 years from China.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Deeplasia: deep learning for bone age assessment validated on skeletal dysplasias.Pediatric radiology · 2024Article
- Precision and Accuracy of Radiological Bone Age Assessment in Children among Different Ethnic Groups: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- [The current status and expectation of pediatric total facial management].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2023Article
- Tanner-Whitehouse skeletal maturity score derived from ultrasound images to evaluate bone age.European radiology · 2023Article
- Alternative methods for skeletal maturity estimation with the EOS scanner-Experience from 934 patients.PloS one · 2022Article
- The Application of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Skeletal Age Assessment.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2022Article
- Comparison of Deep Learning Models for Cervical Vertebral Maturation Stage Classification on Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skeletal age assessment (SAA) is a clinical procedure which is used in determining the SA of children and adolescents. Bone development is influenced by a number of factors, including nutrition, hormonal secretions, and genetics. There are several factors to be borne in mind when using methods of assessing skeletal maturity. These include: Variability among methods, degree of variability in the estimation of skeletal maturation, sources of low accuracy, and dispersion of the values of skeletal maturation. Currently, the main clinical methods for SAA are the Greulich and Pyle (GP) and Tanner and Whitehouse (TW) methods. The GP method has the advantage of being quick and easy to use. A well-trained radiologist takes few minutes to determine the bone age (BA) from a single hand radiograph. The method of TW, however, seems to be more reliable than the GP method. In recent years, the increasing speed in computer sciences and reduction of their cost has given the opportunity to create and use computerized BA estimation system. Despite the fact that the number of automated systems for BAA have increased, most are still within the experimental phase. The use of automated BA determination system, cleared for clinical use in Europe (BoneXpert), has been validated for various ethnicities and children with endocrine disorders. Ultrasound imaging has some limitations that include operator dependence, lower intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of assessment and difficulties with standardization of documentation and imaging transfer. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is noninvasive alternative tool for SA assessment in children. However, few studies have been reported on this topic, and further research is needed to evaluate the reliability and validity of MRI BAAs. In conclusion, at present radiographic methods for the assessment of BA remain the gold standards. Whatever method one adopts, it is essential to minimize the causes of imprecision by taking care to consider the quality of the X-ray. Moreover, it is imperative to assume a correct hand positioning because poor positioning can change the appearance of some bones. It is also preferable to employ scoring methods to these techniques and percentiles rather than BA in years and months. In addition, the possible differences in maturation among different population should be kept in mind.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.