Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25538643›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2014

Cross-cultural differences in crossmodal correspondences between basic tastes and visual features.

Xiaoang Wan, Andy T Woods, Jasper J F van den Bosch, Kirsten J McKenzie, Carlos Velasco, Charles Spence

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Synesthetic Correspondence: An Overview.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Roughness perception: A multisensory/crossmodal perspective.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaoang WanDepartment of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Tsinghua University Beijing, China.
Andy T WoodsXperiment, Lausanne Switzerland.
Jasper J F van den BoschInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA.
Kirsten J McKenzieSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus Semenyih, Malaysia.
Carlos VelascoCrossmodal Research Laboratory, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford Oxford, UK.
Charles SpenceCrossmodal Research Laboratory, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a cross-cultural study designed to investigate crossmodal correspondences between a variety of visual features (11 colors, 15 shapes, and 2 textures) and the five basic taste terms (bitter, salty, sour, sweet, and umami). A total of 452 participants from China, India, Malaysia, and the USA viewed color patches, shapes, and textures online and had to choose the taste term that best matched the image and then rate their confidence in their choice. Across the four groups of participants, the results revealed a number of crossmodal correspondences between certain colors/shapes and bitter, sour, and sweet tastes. Crossmodal correspondences were also documented between the color white and smooth/rough textures on the one hand and the salt taste on the other. Cross-cultural differences were observed in the correspondences between certain colors, shapes, and one of the textures and the taste terms. The taste-patterns shown by the participants from the four countries tested in the present study are quite different from one another, and these differences cannot easily be attributed merely to whether a country is Eastern or Western. These findings therefore highlight the impact of cultural background on crossmodal correspondences. As such, they raise a number of interesting questions regarding the neural mechanisms underlying crossmodal correspondences.

Indexed as

colorcrossmodal correspondencecultureshapetaste/flavortexture

Identifiers

PMID25538643
PMCPMC4259000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.