Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25538593›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2014

Technology-aided programs for post-coma patients emerged from or in a minimally conscious state.

Giulio E Lancioni, Nirbhay N Singh, Mark F O'Reilly, Jeff Sigafoos, Marta Olivetti Belardinelli, Francesca Buonocunto, Fiora D'Amico, Jorge Navarro, Crocifissa Lanzilotti, Gabriele Ferlisi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Giulio E LancioniDepartment of Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari Bari, Italy.
Nirbhay N SinghMedical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University Augusta, GA, USA.
Mark F O'ReillyDepartment of Special Education, University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX, USA.
Jeff SigafoosDepartment of Educational Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington Wellington, New Zealand.
Marta Olivetti BelardinelliDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome Rome, Italy.
Francesca BuonocuntoS. Raffaele Rehabilitation and Care Centers Ceglie and Alberobello, Italy.
Fiora D'AmicoS. Raffaele Rehabilitation and Care Centers Ceglie and Alberobello, Italy.
Jorge NavarroS. Raffaele Rehabilitation and Care Centers Ceglie and Alberobello, Italy.
Crocifissa LanzilottiS. Raffaele Rehabilitation and Care Centers Ceglie and Alberobello, Italy.
Gabriele FerlisiLega F. D'Oro Research Center Osimo, Italy.
Floriana DenittoISPE Medical Care Center Mola di Bari, Bari, Italy.
Astronomical Observatory of Capodimonte · ITAugusta University · USSapienza University of Rome · ITThe University of Texas at Austin · USVictoria University of Wellington · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-coma persons in a minimally conscious state (MCS) or emerged/emerging from such state (E-MCS), who are affected by extensive motor impairment and lack of speech, may develop an active role and interact with their environment with the help of technology-aided intervention programs. Although a number of studies have been conducted in this area during the last few years, new evidence about the efficacy of those programs is warranted. These three studies were an effort in that direction. Study I assessed a technology-aided program to enable six MCS participants to access preferred environmental stimulation independently. Studies II and III assessed technology-aided programs to enable six E-MCS participants to make choices. In Study II, three of those participants were led to choose among leisure and social stimuli, and caregiver interventions automatically presented to them. In Study III, the remaining three participants were led to choose (a) among general stimulus/intervention options (e.g., songs, video-recordings of family members, and caregiver interventions); and then (b) among variants of those options. The results of all three studies were largely positive with substantial increases of independent stimulation access for the participants of Study I and independent choice behavior for the participants of Studies II and III. The results were analyzed in relation to previous data and in terms of their implications for daily contexts working with MCS and E-MCS persons affected by multiple disabilities.

Indexed as

choiceemergence from MCSleisure stimuliminimally conscious state (MCS)newssocial stimulitechnology-aided programs

Identifiers

PMID25538593
PMCPMC4257021
OpenAlexW2032866941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.