Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25538570›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroanatomy2014

Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization.

Max Adrian, Remy Kusters, Corette J Wierenga, Cornelis Storm, Casper C Hoogenraad, Lukas C Kapitein

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Small Differences and Big Changes: The Many Variables of MicroRNA Expression and Function in the Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Aberrant cortical spine dynamics after concussive injury are reversed by integrated stress response inhibition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The MeshCODE to scale-visualising synaptic binary information.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Max AdrianCell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University Utrecht, Netherlands.
Remy KustersDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Corette J WierengaCell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University Utrecht, Netherlands.
Cornelis StormDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology Eindhoven, Netherlands ; Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Casper C HoogenraadCell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University Utrecht, Netherlands.
Lukas C KapiteinCell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University Utrecht, Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLEindhoven University of Technology · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dendritic spines are micron-sized protrusions that harbor the majority of excitatory synapses in the central nervous system. The head of the spine is connected to the dendritic shaft by a 50-400 nm thin membrane tube, called the spine neck, which has been hypothesized to confine biochemical and electric signals within the spine compartment. Such compartmentalization could minimize interspinal crosstalk and thereby support spine-specific synapse plasticity. However, to what extent compartmentalization is governed by spine morphology, and in particular the diameter of the spine neck, has remained unresolved. Here, we review recent advances in tool development - both experimental and theoretical - that facilitate studying the role of the spine neck in compartmentalization. Special emphasis is given to recent advances in microscopy methods and quantitative modeling applications as we discuss compartmentalization of biochemical signals, membrane receptors and electrical signals in spines. Multidisciplinary approaches should help to answer how dendritic spine architecture affects the cellular and molecular processes required for synapse maintenance and modulation.

Indexed as

compartmentdendritic spinediffusionmodelingsuper-resolution microscopy

Identifiers

PMID25538570
PMCPMC4255500
OpenAlexW2167869362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.