ReviewActa ortopedica brasileira2014
Outcomes in orthopedics and traumatology: translating research into practice.
Review in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic criteria and outcome measures in randomized clinical trials on carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic review of the quality of distal radius systematic reviews: Methodology and reporting assessment.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- No benefit for elbow blocking on conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: A 6-month randomized controlled trial.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Article
- Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaires: Exploring Responsiveness and Diagnostic Performance in a Sample of Outpatients with and without Hand and Wrist Complaints.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2022Article
- Onset of Trigger Finger after Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Surgery: Assessment of Open and Endoscopic Techniques.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2021Article
- Percutaneous Fixation without Bone Graft for Scaphoid Nonunion.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2020Article
- Research methodology for orthopaedic surgeons, with a focus on outcome.EFORT open reviews · 2018Article
- Minimal important difference after hand surgery: a prospective assessment for DASH, MHQ, and SF-12.SICOT-J · 2016Article
- Article
- APPLICABILITY OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN HAND SURGERY: SURVEY STUDY.Acta ortopedica brasileiraArticle
- PRWE application in distal radius fracture: comparison and correlation with established outcomes.Revista brasileira de ortopediaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical research is focused in generating evidence that is feasible to be applicable to practitioners. However, translating research-focused evidence into practice may be challenging and often misleading. This article aims is to pinpoint these challenges and suggest some methodological safeguards, taking platelet-rich plasma therapies and knee osteochondral injuries as examples. Studies and systematic reviews involving the following concepts will be investigated: clinically relevant outcomes, systematic errors on sample calculation, internal and external validity. Relevant studies on platelet-rich plasma for muscle-tendon lesions and updates on osteochondral lesions treatment were included in this analysis. Authors and clinicians should consider these concepts for the implementation and application of dissemination of the best evidence. Research results should be challenged by a weighted analysis of its methodological soundness and applicability. Level of Evidence V, Therapeutic Studies - Investigating the Results of Treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.