Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25538398›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of medical and paediatric oncology : official journal of Indian Society of Medical & Paediatric Oncology2014

Indian Council of Medical Research consensus document for the management of gastric cancer.

Shailesh V Shrikhande, Bhawna Sirohi, Savio G Barreto, Raju T Chacko, Purvish M Parikh, Jeremy Pautu, Supreeta Arya, Prachi Patil, Srinivas C Chilukuri, B Ganesh and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of medical and paediatric oncology : official journal of Indian Society of Medical & Paediatric Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Shailesh V ShrikhandeDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Kiran Mazumdar Shaw Cancer Centre, Narayana Health, Bangalore, India.
Bhawna SirohiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kiran Mazumdar Shaw Cancer Centre, Narayana Health, Bangalore, India.
Savio G BarretoInstitute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Raju T ChackoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Purvish M ParikhDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Kiran Mazumdar Shaw Cancer Centre, Narayana Health, Bangalore, India.
Jeremy PautuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mizoram Sate Cancer Institute, Aizwal, Mizoram, India.
Supreeta AryaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Prachi PatilDepartment of DDCN, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Srinivas C ChilukuriDepartment of Radiotherapy, Yashoda Hospital, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
B GaneshDepartment of Epidemiology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Tanvir KaurIndian Council of Medical Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Deepak ShuklaIndian Council of Medical Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Goura Shankar RathDepartment of Radiotherapy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INNarayana Health · INTata Memorial Hospital · INCancer Institute (WIA) · INChristian Medical College · INMedanta The Medicity · INYashoda Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The document is based on consensus among the experts and best available evidence pertaining to Indian population and is meant for practice in India.Evaluation of a patient with newly diagnosed gastric cancer should include essential tests: A standard white light endoscopy with multiple biopsies from the tumor for confirmation of the diagnosis, a computed tomography (CT) scan (multi-detector or helical) of the abdomen and pelvis for staging with a CT chest or chest X-ray, and complete blood counts, renal and liver function tests. Endoscopic ultrasonography/ magnetic resonance imaging/positron emission tomography-CT is not recommended for all patients.For early stage disease (IA/B, N0), surgery alone is recommended. The need for adjuvant treatment would be guided by the histopathological analysis of the resected specimen.For locally advanced stage (IB, N(+) to IIIC), neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be considered to downstage the disease followed by surgery. This may be followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (as part of the peri-operative chemotherapy regimen)Patients with stage IV/metastatic disease must be assessed for chemotherapy versus best supportive care on an individual basis.Clinical examination including history and physical examination are recommended at each follow-up visit, with a yearly CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis.HER2 testing should be considered in patients with metastatic disease.5-FU may be replaced with capecitabine if patients do not have gastric outlet obstruction. Cisplatin may be replaced with oxaliplatin in the regimens.

Indexed as

Diagnosisgastric cancerguidelinesIndian Council of Medical Researchtreatment

Identifiers

PMID25538398
PMCPMC4264267
OpenAlexW4234615952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.