Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25538113›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2015

Predicting species' tolerance to salinity and alkalinity using distribution data and geochemical modelling: a case study using Australian grasses.

C Haris Saslis-Lagoudakis, Xia Hua, Elisabeth Bui, Camile Moray, Lindell Bromham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Prediction of Lime Tolerance inFrontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Biodiversity analysis in the digital era.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C Haris Saslis-LagoudakisCentre for Macroevolution and Macroecology, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia and CSIRO Land and Water, GPO Box 1666, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia C.H.SaslisLagoudakis@gmail.com.
Xia HuaCentre for Macroevolution and Macroecology, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia and CSIRO Land and Water, GPO Box 1666, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia.
Elisabeth BuiCentre for Macroevolution and Macroecology, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia and CSIRO Land and Water, GPO Box 1666, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia.
Camile MorayCentre for Macroevolution and Macroecology, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia and CSIRO Land and Water, GPO Box 1666, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia.
Lindell BromhamCentre for Macroevolution and Macroecology, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia and CSIRO Land and Water, GPO Box 1666, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsSalt tolerance has evolved many times independently in different plant groups. One possible explanation for this pattern is that it builds upon a general suite of stress-tolerance traits. If this is the case, then we might expect a correlation between salt tolerance and other tolerances to different environmental stresses. This association has been hypothesized for salt and alkalinity tolerance. However, a major limitation in investigating large-scale patterns of these tolerances is that lists of known tolerant species are incomplete. This study explores whether species' salt and alkalinity tolerance can be predicted using geochemical modelling for Australian grasses. The correlation between taxa found in conditions of high predicted salinity and alkalinity is then assessed.

methodsExtensive occurrence data for Australian grasses is used together with geochemical modelling to predict values of pH and electrical conductivity to which species are exposed in their natural distributions. Using parametric and phylogeny-corrected tests, the geochemical predictions are evaluated using a list of known halophytes as a control, and it is determined whether taxa that occur in conditions of high predicted salinity are also found in conditions of high predicted alkalinity. KEY

resultsIt is shown that genera containing known halophytes have higher predicted salinity conditions than those not containing known halophytes. Additionally, taxa occurring in high predicted salinity tend to also occur in high predicted alkalinity.

conclusionsGeochemical modelling using species' occurrence data is a potentially useful approach to predict species' relative natural tolerance to challenging environmental conditions. The findings also demonstrate a correlation between salinity tolerance and alkalinity tolerance. Further investigations can consider the phylogenetic distribution of specific traits involved in these ecophysiological strategies, ideally by incorporating more complete, finer-scale geochemical information, as well as laboratory experiments.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSalinitySalt ToleranceAustraliaHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationPlant DispersalPoaceaeSalt-Tolerant PlantsSodium ChlorideSodium Chloridealkalinity tolerancegeochemical modellinggrasseshalophytesmacroevolutionphylogenyPoaceaesalt tolerancestress resistance syndrome

Identifiers

PMID25538113
PMCPMC4332611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.