ArticleAnnals of botany2015
Arachis batizocoi: a study of its relationship to cultivated peanut (A. hypogaea) and its potential for introgression of wild genes into the peanut crop using induced allotetraploids.
Abstract read
In one paragraph
Article in Annals of botany, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction of an introgression line population for cultivated peanut (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- A single hybrid origin of cultivated peanut.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- Evolutionary Fate of the Opine Synthesis Genes in theBiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Evaluation of Wild Peanut Species and Their Allotetraploids for Resistance against Thrips and Thrips-Transmitted Tomato Spotted Wilt Orthotospovirus (TSWV).Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Marker-assisted introgression of wild chromosome segments conferring resistance to fungal foliar diseases into peanut (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Comparative repeatome analysis reveals new evidence on genome evolution in wild diploid Arachis (Fabaceae) species.Planta · 2022Article
- Genetic mapping and QTL analysis for peanut smut resistance.BMC plant biology · 2021Article
- Development and Genetic Characterization of Peanut Advanced Backcross Lines That Incorporate Root-Knot Nematode Resistance FromFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Chloroplast Phylogenomic Analyses Reveal a Maternal Hybridization Event Leading to the Formation of Cultivated Peanuts.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- A new source of root-knot nematode resistance from Arachis stenosperma incorporated into allotetraploid peanut (Arachis hypogaea).Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Twelve complete chloroplast genomes of wild peanuts: great genetic resources and a better understanding of Arachis phylogeny.BMC plant biology · 2019Article
- Impact of Chromosomal Rearrangements on the Interpretation of Lupin Karyotype Evolution.Genes · 2019Article
- Article
- Resistance to Thrips in Peanut and Implications for Management of Thrips and Thrips-Transmitted Orthotospoviruses in Peanut.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Review
- Introgression of wild alleles into the tetraploid peanut crop to improve water use efficiency, earliness and yield.PloS one · 2018Article
- Evolutionary dynamics of an at-rich satellite DNA and its contribution to karyotype differentiation in wild diploid Arachis species.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2017Article
- Genome-wide SNP Genotyping Resolves Signatures of Selection and Tetrasomic Recombination in Peanut.Molecular plant · 2017Article
- Genome-Wide Discovery and Deployment of Insertions and Deletions Markers Provided Greater Insights on Species, Genomes, and Sections Relationships in the GenusFrontiers in plant science · 2017Article
- Evidence of Genomic Exchanges between Homeologous Chromosomes in a Cross of Peanut with Newly Synthetized Allotetraploid Hybrids.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Soraya C M Leal-BertioliEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB W5 Norte Final, CP 02372, CEP 70.770-917, Brasília, DF, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, CEP 70.910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil, Catholic University of Brasilia, Biotechnology and Genomic Sciences, SGAN 916 Avenida W5, CEP 70.790-160, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna A-1400, Austria and Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA soraya.bertioli@embrapa.br.
Silvio P SantosEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB W5 Norte Final, CP 02372, CEP 70.770-917, Brasília, DF, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, CEP 70.910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil, Catholic University of Brasilia, Biotechnology and Genomic Sciences, SGAN 916 Avenida W5, CEP 70.790-160, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna A-1400, Austria and Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB W5 Norte Final, CP 02372, CEP 70.770-917, Brasília, DF, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, CEP 70.910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil, Catholic University of Brasilia, Biotechnology and Genomic Sciences, SGAN 916 Avenida W5, CEP 70.790-160, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna A-1400, Austria and Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Karinne M DantasEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB W5 Norte Final, CP 02372, CEP 70.770-917, Brasília, DF, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, CEP 70.910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil, Catholic University of Brasilia, Biotechnology and Genomic Sciences, SGAN 916 Avenida W5, CEP 70.790-160, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna A-1400, Austria and Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB W5 Norte Final, CP 02372, CEP 70.770-917, Brasília, DF, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, CEP 70.910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil, Catholic University of Brasilia, Biotechnology and Genomic Sciences, SGAN 916 Avenida W5, CEP 70.790-160, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna A-1400, Austria and Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Peter W InglisEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB W5 Norte Final, CP 02372, CEP 70.770-917, Brasília, DF, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, CEP 70.910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil, Catholic University of Brasilia, Biotechnology and Genomic Sciences, SGAN 916 Avenida W5, CEP 70.790-160, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna A-1400, Austria and Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Stephan NielenEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB W5 Norte Final, CP 02372, CEP 70.770-917, Brasília, DF, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, CEP 70.910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil, Catholic University of Brasilia, Biotechnology and Genomic Sciences, SGAN 916 Avenida W5, CEP 70.790-160, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna A-1400, Austria and Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB W5 Norte Final, CP 02372, CEP 70.770-917, Brasília, DF, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, CEP 70.910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil, Catholic University of Brasilia, Biotechnology and Genomic Sciences, SGAN 916 Avenida W5, CEP 70.790-160, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna A-1400, Austria and Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Ana C G AraujoEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB W5 Norte Final, CP 02372, CEP 70.770-917, Brasília, DF, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, CEP 70.910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil, Catholic University of Brasilia, Biotechnology and Genomic Sciences, SGAN 916 Avenida W5, CEP 70.790-160, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna A-1400, Austria and Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Joseane P SilvaEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB W5 Norte Final, CP 02372, CEP 70.770-917, Brasília, DF, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, CEP 70.910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil, Catholic University of Brasilia, Biotechnology and Genomic Sciences, SGAN 916 Avenida W5, CEP 70.790-160, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna A-1400, Austria and Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Uiara CavalcanteEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB W5 Norte Final, CP 02372, CEP 70.770-917, Brasília, DF, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, CEP 70.910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil, Catholic University of Brasilia, Biotechnology and Genomic Sciences, SGAN 916 Avenida W5, CEP 70.790-160, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna A-1400, Austria and Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB W5 Norte Final, CP 02372, CEP 70.770-917, Brasília, DF, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, CEP 70.910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil, Catholic University of Brasilia, Biotechnology and Genomic Sciences, SGAN 916 Avenida W5, CEP 70.790-160, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna A-1400, Austria and Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Patricia M GuimarãesEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB W5 Norte Final, CP 02372, CEP 70.770-917, Brasília, DF, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, CEP 70.910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil, Catholic University of Brasilia, Biotechnology and Genomic Sciences, SGAN 916 Avenida W5, CEP 70.790-160, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna A-1400, Austria and Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Ana Cristina M BrasileiroEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB W5 Norte Final, CP 02372, CEP 70.770-917, Brasília, DF, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, CEP 70.910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil, Catholic University of Brasilia, Biotechnology and Genomic Sciences, SGAN 916 Avenida W5, CEP 70.790-160, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna A-1400, Austria and Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Noelia Carrasquilla-GarciaEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB W5 Norte Final, CP 02372, CEP 70.770-917, Brasília, DF, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, CEP 70.910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil, Catholic University of Brasilia, Biotechnology and Genomic Sciences, SGAN 916 Avenida W5, CEP 70.790-160, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna A-1400, Austria and Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
R Varma PenmetsaEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB W5 Norte Final, CP 02372, CEP 70.770-917, Brasília, DF, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, CEP 70.910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil, Catholic University of Brasilia, Biotechnology and Genomic Sciences, SGAN 916 Avenida W5, CEP 70.790-160, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna A-1400, Austria and Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Douglas CookEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB W5 Norte Final, CP 02372, CEP 70.770-917, Brasília, DF, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, CEP 70.910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil, Catholic University of Brasilia, Biotechnology and Genomic Sciences, SGAN 916 Avenida W5, CEP 70.790-160, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna A-1400, Austria and Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Márcio C MoretzsohnEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB W5 Norte Final, CP 02372, CEP 70.770-917, Brasília, DF, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, CEP 70.910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil, Catholic University of Brasilia, Biotechnology and Genomic Sciences, SGAN 916 Avenida W5, CEP 70.790-160, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna A-1400, Austria and Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
David J BertioliEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB W5 Norte Final, CP 02372, CEP 70.770-917, Brasília, DF, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, CEP 70.910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil, Catholic University of Brasilia, Biotechnology and Genomic Sciences, SGAN 916 Avenida W5, CEP 70.790-160, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna A-1400, Austria and Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB W5 Norte Final, CP 02372, CEP 70.770-917, Brasília, DF, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, CEP 70.910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil, Catholic University of Brasilia, Biotechnology and Genomic Sciences, SGAN 916 Avenida W5, CEP 70.790-160, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna A-1400, Austria and Department of Plant Pathology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsArachis batizocoi is a wild relative of cultivated peanut (A. hypogaea), an allotetraploid with an AABB genome. Arachis batizocoi was once considered the ancestral donor of the peanut B genome, but cytogenetics and DNA phylogenies have indicated a new genome classification, 'K'. These observations seem inconsistent with genetic studies and breeding that have shown that A. batizocoi can behave as a B genome.
methodsThe genetic behaviour, genome composition and phylogenetic position of A. batizocoi were studied using controlled hybridizations, induced tetraploidy, whole-genome in situ fluorescent hybridization (GISH) and molecular phylogenetics. KEY
resultsSterile diploid hybrids containing AK genomes were obtained using A. batizocoi and the A genome species A. duranensis, A. stenosperma, A. correntina or A. villosa. From these, three types of AAKK allotetraploids were obtained, each in multiple independent polyploidy events. Induced allotetraploids were vigorous and fertile, and were hybridized to A. hypogaea to produce F1 hybrids. Even with the same parental combination, fertility of these F1 hybrids varied greatly, suggesting the influence of stochastic genetic or epigenetic events. Interestingly, hybrids with A. hypogaea ssp. hypogaea were significantly more fertile than those with the subspecies fastigiata. GISH in cultivated × induced allotetraploids hybrids (harbouring AABK genomes) and a molecular phylogeny using 16 intron sequences showed that the K genome is distinct, but more closely related to the B than to the A genome.
conclusionsThe K genome of A. batizocoi is more related to B than to the A genome, but is distinct. As such, when incorporated in an induced allotetraploid (AAKK) it can behave as a B genome in crosses with peanut. However, the fertility of hybrids and their progeny depends upon the compatibility of the A genome interactions. The genetic distinctness of A. batizocoi makes it an important source of allelic diversity in itself, especially in crosses involving A. hypogaea ssp. hypogaea.
Indexed as
Genome, PlantHybridization, GeneticPhylogenyPolyploidyArachisFabaceaeGenetic VariationIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMolecular Sequence DataSequence Analysis, DNAA. hypogaeaallotetraploidArachis batizocoiGISHgroundnutintrogressionintron sequencesK genomeorthologous genespeanutpolyploidizationpre-breedingwild species
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390
Registered trials
None linked
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.