Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25537479›Full record

ArticleBiometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine2015

Endogenous concentrations of biologically relevant metals in rat brain and cochlea determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry.

Stacia R Wegst-Uhrich, Elizabeth J Mullin, Dalian Ding, Senthilvelan Manohar, Richard Salvi, Diana S Aga, Jerome A Roth

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A FRET-based fluorescent ZnChemical science · 2020
    Article
  2. Toxicology study for magnetic injection of prednisolone into the rat cochlea.European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stacia R Wegst-UhrichDepartment of Chemistry, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA, srwegst@buffalo.edu.
Elizabeth J Mullin
Dalian Ding
Senthilvelan Manohar
Richard Salvi
Diana S Aga
Jerome A Roth
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USWomen & Children's Hospital of Buffalo · USXiangya Hospital Central South University · CN

Funding

Occupational exposure to manganese and noise potentiate hearing lossR01OH010235 · OH · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI ROTH, JEROME ALLAN, SALVI, RICHARD J · 2012 to 2015
$2.0M
HHS #R010HH010311-01NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH010235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn) are essential nutrients which aid in the proper functioning of cells, but high concentrations of these metals can be toxic to various organs. Little is known about the endogenous concentrations of these metals in the cochlea, the auditory portion of the inner ear which is extremely small and difficult to access. To fill this gap, a trace quantitative digestion and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry method was developed to determine the concentrations of these metals in the stria vascularis, organ of Corti, and spiral ganglion, three critically important parts of the cochlea (≤ 1.5 mg); these values were compared to those in specific brain regions (≤ 20 mg) of rats. Rats were sacrificed and the cochlea and brain regions were carefully isolated, digested, and analyzed to determine baseline concentrations of Mn, Fe, Cu, and Zn. In the cochlea, Mn, Fe, Cu, and Zn concentrations ranged from 3.2-6, 73-300, non-detect, and 13-200 µg/g respectively. In the brain, Mn, Fe, Cu, and Zn concentrations ranged from 1.3-2.72, 21-120, 5.0-10.6, and 33-47 µg/g respectively. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between the tissue types within the cochlea, and between the cochlea and brain. This validated method provides the first quantitative assessment of these metals in the three key subdivisions of the cochlea compared to the levels in the brain; Mn, Fe, and Zn levels were considerably higher in the cochlea than brain.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCochleaCopperIronMaleManganeseMass SpectrometryMetals, HeavyRatsZincCopperIronManganeseMetals, HeavyZinc

Identifiers

PMID25537479
PMCPMC9124583
OpenAlexW2056595835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.