ArticleJournal of digital imaging2015
Ultrasound-Derived Three-Dimensional Printing in Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of 3-D printing in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2017Pooled it
- A review of 3D printed medical implant design.3D printing in medicine · 2026Article
- The Use of Additive Manufacturing Techniques in the Development of Polymeric Molds: A Review.Polymers · 2024Review
- Translating Imaging Into 3D Printed Cardiovascular Phantoms: A Systematic Review of Applications, Technologies, and Validation.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2022Review
- Design and 3D printing of variant pediatric heart models for training based on a single patient scan.3D printing in medicine · 2021Article
- Conversion of prior univentricular repairs to septated circulation: Case selection, challenges, and outcomes.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2021Review
- Moving beyond two-dimensional screens to interactive three-dimensional visualization in congenital heart disease.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020Review
- Three-dimensional printing in congenital heart disease.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Review
- Patient-specific three-dimensional printed heart models benefit preoperative planning for complex congenital heart disease.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2019Article
- Registration Accuracy of Patient-Specific, Three-Dimensional-Printed Prostate Molds for Correlating Pathology With Magnetic Resonance Imaging.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2019Article
- 3D printing for congenital heart disease: a single site's initial three-yearexperience.3D printing in medicine · 2018Article
- Modeling Fetal Cardiac Anomalies From Prenatal Echocardiography With 3-Dimensional Printing and 4-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2018Article
- 3D Printing is a Transformative Technology in Congenital Heart Disease.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2018Review
- Image once, print thrice? Three-dimensional printing of replacement parts.The British journal of radiology · 2018Review
- 3D Printing in Surgical Management of Double Outlet Right Ventricle.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2017Review
- Integration of Computed Tomography and Three-Dimensional Echocardiography for Hybrid Three-Dimensional Printing in Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of digital imaging · 2016Article
- Applications of 3D printing in cardiovascular diseases.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2016Review
- 3D printing in medicine of congenital heart diseases.3D printing in medicine · 2015Review
- Streamlined, Inexpensive 3D Printing of the Brain and Skull.PloS one · 2015Article
- Three-dimensional-printed cardiac prototypes aid surgical decision-making and preoperative planning in selected cases of complex congenital heart diseases: Early experience and proof of concept in a resource-limited environment.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional printing technology has significant clinical implications for the management of congenital heart disease. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging have been established as imaging tools for the creation of physical three-dimensional models. The potential use of non-invasive bedside imaging techniques such as three-dimensional echocardiography to derive three-dimensional printed models can revolutionize the planning of interventions for complex congenital malformations. The feasibility of deriving three-dimensional printing from ultrasound provides an additional cost-effective and patient-centered option for interventional cardiologists and surgeons for the management and care of congenital heart disease patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.