Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25537447›Full record

ArticleIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro2015

A cell-ECM screening method to predict breast cancer metastasis.

L E Barney, E C Dandley, L E Jansen, N G Reich, A M Mercurio, S R Peyton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cell-Instructive Biomaterials with Native-Like Biochemical Complexity.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Live Cell Lineage Tracing of Dormant Cancer Cells.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Vascularized Biomaterials to Study Cancer Metastasis.Advanced healthcare materials · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

L E BarneyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA. speyton@ecs.umass.edu.
E C Dandley
L E Jansen
N G Reich
A M Mercurio
S R Peyton
University of Massachusetts Amherst · USAmherst College · USCancer Research And Biostatistics · USNorth Carolina State University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

CHEMISTRY-BIOLOGY INTERFACE PREDOCTORAL TRAINING GRANTST32GM008515 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI THOMPSON, LYNMARIE K. · 1995 to 2020
$4.3M
VEGF Signaling in Mammary TumorigenesisR01CA168464 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI MERCURIO, ARTHUR M · 2012 to 2021
$3.7M
Tissue-specific stem cells and breast cancer tissue tropism in bioengineered microenvironmentsDP2CA186573 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI PEYTON, SHELLY R. · 2013 to 2015
$2.6M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS 1DP2CA186573-01NCI NIH HHS CA168464NCI NIH HHS DP2 CA186573NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168464NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer preferentially spreads to the bone, brain, liver, and lung. The clinical patterns of this tissue-specific spread (tropism) cannot be explained by blood flow alone, yet our understanding of what mediates tropism to these physically and chemically diverse tissues is limited. While the microenvironment has been recognized as a critical factor in governing metastatic colonization, the role of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in mediating tropism has not been thoroughly explored. We created a simple biomaterial platform with systematic control over the ECM protein density and composition to determine if integrin binding governs how metastatic cells differentiate between secondary tissue sites. Instead of examining individual behaviors, we compiled large patterns of phenotypes associated with adhesion to and migration on these controlled ECMs. In combining this novel analysis with a simple biomaterial platform, we created an in vitro fingerprint that is predictive of in vivo metastasis. This rapid biomaterial screen also provided information on how β1, α2, and α6 integrins might mediate metastasis in patients, providing insights beyond a purely genetic analysis. We propose that this approach of screening many cell-ECM interactions, across many different heterogeneous cell lines, is predictive of in vivo behavior, and is much simpler, faster, and more economical than complex 3D environments or mouse models. We also propose that when specifically applied toward the question of tissue tropism in breast cancer, it can be used to provide insight into certain integrin subunits as therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBreast NeoplasmsCell AdhesionCell Line, TumorCell MovementExtracellular MatrixFemaleHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansIntegrinsMCF-7 CellsMiceNeoplasm MetastasisOrgan SpecificityPhenotypeBiocompatible MaterialsIntegrins

Identifiers

PMID25537447
PMCPMC4323858
OpenAlexW1966657242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.