ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2015
Growth responses of two tall fescue cultivars to Pb stress and their metal accumulation characteristics.
Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptability assessment of Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus terreus isolated from long-term municipal/industrial effluent-irrigated soils to cadmium stress.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Heavy Metal-Resistant Plant Growth-PromotingFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Bioremediation and tolerance of zinc ions usingHeliyon · 2020Article
- Impact of salicylic acid on the growth and physiological activities of parsley plants under lead toxicity.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2020Article
- Transcriptome profilings of two tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) cultivars in response to lead (Pb) stress.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Germination, Physiological Responses and Gene Expression of Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) Growing under Pb and Cd.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea), a widely planted cool-season turfgrass and forage, is tolerant to heavy metals. However, previous investigation demonstrated that different accessions varied in Pb tolerance. In present study, hydroponic system was used to study the effects of Pb on two tall fescue cultivars, Pb tolerant 'Silverado' and Pb sensitive 'AST7001', respectively. The results indicated that Pb concentration was 14 times lower in shoots of 'Silverado' (1.34 mg g(-1) dry weight) versus 'AST7001' (19.92 mg g(-1) dry weight), although it was higher in roots of 'Silverado' (68.28 mg g(-1) dry weight) versus 'AST7001' (48.7 mg g(-1) dry weight), when subjected to 1,000 mg L(-1) Pb. In both cultivars, Pb caused an induction in malondialdehyde (MDA) content, to a less increase in 'Silerado' than 'AST7001'. Pb treatment decreased significantly soluble protein content in 'AST7001'. By contrast, soluble protein content was increased progressively, and the ratio of variable to maximal chlorophyll fluorescence was not affected in 'Silverado'. Pb treated tall fescue leaves had a greater level of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and guaiacol peroxidase (POD) activity in both cultivars, however, increase was sharp in 'Silverado' plants. The results of Q-PCR analysis for genes encoding antioxidant enzyme were in accordance with that of enzyme activities. The higher Pb tolerance of 'Silverado' might be attributed to lower shoot Pb concentration and MDA content. Meantime, the amount of soluble protein, activity of SOD and POD, as well as the level of up regulation of Cyt Cu/ZnSOD was all higher in 'Silverado' than in 'AST7001'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25537098What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.