ArticleGlobal public health2015
Sexual and reproductive health and rights in changing health systems.
Article in Global public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Successful strategies that address gender-related barriers and promote bodily autonomy within efforts to scale up and sustain postpregnancy contraception: a scoping review.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- The complex relationship between climate anomalies and reproductive attitudes and practices in low- and middle-income countries.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Review
- Forbidden Conversations: A Comprehensive Exploration of Taboos in Sexual and Reproductive Health.Cureus · 2024Review
- Advancing Our Understanding of Provider Behavior Change for Improved Health Outcomes.Global health, science and practice · 2023Article
- The Impact of Introducing Midwives and also Mentoring on the Quality of Sexual, Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Adolescent Health Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Integrative Review Protocol.Methods and protocols · 2023Article
- Factors that determine women's autonomy to make decisions about sexual and reproductive health and rights in Nepal: A cross-sectional study.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Interrupted Access to and Use of Family Planning Among Youth in a Community-Based Service in Zimbabwe During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Studies in family planning · 2022Article
- The cost-effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health and rights interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2021Article
- Trends in National-Level Governance and Implementation of the Philippines' Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Law from 2014 to 2020.Global health, science and practice · 2021Article
- Disciplining sexual and reproductive behaviour of tuberculosis patients in Bangladesh: a mixed method study exploring divergent messages.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2021Article
- Priorities for sexual and reproductive health in Morocco as part of universal health coverage: maternal health as a national priority.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2020Article
- Sexual and reproductive health services in universal health coverage: a review of recent evidence from low- and middle-income countries.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2020Review
- The integration of sexual and reproductive health and rights into universal health coverage: a FIGO perspective.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2020Article
- Employment based health financing does not support gender equity in universal health coverage.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2020Article
- Minding the gaps: health financing, universal health coverage and gender.Health policy and planning · 2017Article
- Negotiating Discourses of Shame, Secrecy, and Silence: Migrant and Refugee Women's Experiences of Sexual Embodiment.Archives of sexual behavior · 2017Article
- Exploring linkages between research, policy and practice in the Netherlands: perspectives on sexual and reproductive health and rights knowledge flows.Health research policy and systems · 2017Article
- Advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in low- and middle-income countries: implications for the post-2015 global development agenda.Global public health · 2015Article
- Commentary: Mexico: moving from universal health coverage towards health care for all.Global public health · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) are centrally important to health. However, there have been significant shortcomings in implementing SRHR to date. In the context of health systems reform and universal health coverage/care (UHC), this paper explores the following questions. What do these changes in health systems thinking mean for SRHR and gender equity in health in the context of renewed calls for increased investments in the health of women and girls? Can SRHR be integrated usefully into the call for UHC, and if so how? Can health systems reforms address the continuing sexual and reproductive ill health and violations of sexual and reproductive rights (SRR)? Conversely, can the attention to individual human rights that is intrinsic to the SRHR agenda and its continuing concerns about equality, quality and accountability provide impetus for strengthening the health system? The paper argues that achieving equity on the UHC path will require a combination of system improvements and services that benefit all, together with special attention to those whose needs are great and who are likely to fall behind in the politics of choice and voice (i.e., progressive universalism paying particular attention to gender inequalities).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.