Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25536059›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Multiplex networks of cortical and hippocampal neurons revealed at different timescales.

Nicholas Timme, Shinya Ito, Maxym Myroshnychenko, Fang-Chin Yeh, Emma Hiolski, Pawel Hottowy, John M Beggs

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Computation is concentrated in rich clubs of local cortical networks.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Nonmonotonic spatial structure of interneuronal correlations in prefrontal microcircuits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas TimmeDepartment of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, 47405, United States of America.
Shinya ItoSanta Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, 95064, United States of America.
Maxym MyroshnychenkoProgram in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, 47405, United States of America.
Fang-Chin YehDepartment of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, 47405, United States of America.
Emma HiolskiDepartment of Microbiology & Environmental Toxicology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, 95064, United States of America.
Pawel HottowyPhysics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059, Krakow, Poland.
John M BeggsDepartment of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, 47405, United States of America.
Indiana University Bloomington · USUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have emphasized the importance of multiplex networks--interdependent networks with shared nodes and different types of connections--in systems primarily outside of neuroscience. Though the multiplex properties of networks are frequently not considered, most networks are actually multiplex networks and the multiplex specific features of networks can greatly affect network behavior (e.g. fault tolerance). Thus, the study of networks of neurons could potentially be greatly enhanced using a multiplex perspective. Given the wide range of temporally dependent rhythms and phenomena present in neural systems, we chose to examine multiplex networks of individual neurons with time scale dependent connections. To study these networks, we used transfer entropy--an information theoretic quantity that can be used to measure linear and nonlinear interactions--to systematically measure the connectivity between individual neurons at different time scales in cortical and hippocampal slice cultures. We recorded the spiking activity of almost 12,000 neurons across 60 tissue samples using a 512-electrode array with 60 micrometer inter-electrode spacing and 50 microsecond temporal resolution. To the best of our knowledge, this preparation and recording method represents a superior combination of number of recorded neurons and temporal and spatial recording resolutions to any currently available in vivo system. We found that highly connected neurons ("hubs") were localized to certain time scales, which, we hypothesize, increases the fault tolerance of the network. Conversely, a large proportion of non-hub neurons were not localized to certain time scales. In addition, we found that long and short time scale connectivity was uncorrelated. Finally, we found that long time scale networks were significantly less modular and more disassortative than short time scale networks in both tissue types. As far as we are aware, this analysis represents the first systematic study of temporally dependent multiplex networks among individual neurons.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCerebral CortexEntropyHippocampusMice, Inbred C57BLModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeurons

Identifiers

PMID25536059
PMCPMC4275261
OpenAlexW2007318902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.