Trial reportPloS one2014
Evaluation of intradural stimulation efficiency and selectivity in a computational model of spinal cord stimulation.
Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intradural Percutaneous Stimulation - Inducing Physiological Responses.
Targeting the Conus Medullaris With ECAP-Controlled Closed-Loop SCS for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain: HOPE Trial
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of computational models for the design of spinal cord stimulation therapies: from neural circuits to patient-specific simulations.The Journal of physiology · 2023Pooled it
- The optimization of neuroprosthetic interfaces relying on biophysical and surrogate digital twins.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Transcutaneous interference spinal cord stimulation: leadfield-based pareto optimization of electrode montages for improved focality.Biomedical engineering letters · 2026Article
- Directional leads applied to spinal cord stimulation: A computational modelling study.PloS one · 2026Article
- SpIC3D imaging for spinal in situ contrast 3D visualization.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- Computational Optimization of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Dorsal Horn Interneuron Polarization.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2025Article
- Daily electric field treatment improves functional outcomes after thoracic contusion spinal cord injury in rats.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Role of frequency-dependent and capacitive tissue properties in spinal cord stimulation models.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Dentate gyrus granule cell activation following extracellular electrical stimulation: a multi-scale computational model to guide hippocampal neurostimulation strategies.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Mechanisms and clinical progress of spinal cord stimulation in refractory chronic pain: an overview.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Correlating Evoked Electromyography and Anatomic Factors During Spinal Cord Stimulation Implantation With Short-Term Outcomes.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2024Article
- Neural Tissue-Like, not Supraphysiological, Electrical Conductivity Stimulates Neuronal Lineage Specification through Calcium Signaling and Epigenetic Modification.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Quasistatic approximation in neuromodulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Review
- Biophysics of Frequency-Dependent Variation in Paresthesia and Pain Relief during Spinal Cord Stimulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- A Virtual Inner Ear Model Selects Ramped Pulse Shapes for Vestibular Afferent Stimulation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Finite element analysis of electric field distribution during direct current stimulation of the spinal cord: Implications for device design.APL bioengineering · 2023Article
- An optimization framework for targeted spinal cord stimulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2023Article
- Biocompatibility of graphene oxide nanosheets functionalized with various amino acids towards mesenchymal stem cells.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Measuring and modeling the effects of vagus nerve stimulation on heart rate and laryngeal muscles.Bioelectronic medicine · 2023Article
- Neural Recruitment During Conventional, Burst, and 10-kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Pain.The journal of pain · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an alternative or adjunct therapy to treat chronic pain, a prevalent and clinically challenging condition. Although SCS has substantial clinical success, the therapy is still prone to failures, including lead breakage, lead migration, and poor pain relief. The goal of this study was to develop a computational model of SCS and use the model to compare activation of neural elements during intradural and extradural electrode placement. We constructed five patient-specific models of SCS. Stimulation thresholds predicted by the model were compared to stimulation thresholds measured intraoperatively, and we used these models to quantify the efficiency and selectivity of intradural and extradural SCS. Intradural placement dramatically increased stimulation efficiency and reduced the power required to stimulate the dorsal columns by more than 90%. Intradural placement also increased selectivity, allowing activation of a greater proportion of dorsal column fibers before spread of activation to dorsal root fibers, as well as more selective activation of individual dermatomes at different lateral deviations from the midline. Further, the results suggest that current electrode designs used for extradural SCS are not optimal for intradural SCS, and a novel azimuthal tripolar design increased stimulation selectivity, even beyond that achieved with an intradural paddle array. Increased stimulation efficiency is expected to increase the battery life of implantable pulse generators, increase the recharge interval of rechargeable implantable pulse generators, and potentially reduce stimulator volume. The greater selectivity of intradural stimulation may improve the success rate of SCS by mitigating the sensitivity of pain relief to malpositioning of the electrode. The outcome of this effort is a better quantitative understanding of how intradural electrode placement can potentially increase the selectivity and efficiency of SCS, which, in turn, provides predictions that can be tested in future clinical studies assessing the potential therapeutic benefits of intradural SCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.