Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25536035›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2014

Evaluation of intradural stimulation efficiency and selectivity in a computational model of spinal cord stimulation.

Bryan Howell, Shivanand P Lad, Warren M Grill

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03380104 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Intradural Percutaneous Stimulation - Inducing Physiological Responses.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMatthew HowardRan2020 to 2020Enrolled0ConditionsPain, ChronicArmsIntradural Spinal Cord Stimulation, Administration of Questionnaires
NCT06413277 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Targeting the Conus Medullaris With ECAP-Controlled Closed-Loop SCS for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain: HOPE Trial

TypeobservationalSponsorAinsworth Institute of Pain ManagementRan2024 to 2027Enrolled20ConditionsChronic Pelvic Pain, Pudendal NeuralgiaArmsSaluda Evoke Smart SCS System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Computational Optimization of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Dorsal Horn Interneuron Polarization.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Quasistatic approximation in neuromodulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2024
    Review
  14. Biophysics of Frequency-Dependent Variation in Paresthesia and Pain Relief during Spinal Cord Stimulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bryan HowellDuke University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Shivanand P LadDuke University, Department of Surgery, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Warren M GrillDuke University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Durham, NC, United States of America; Duke University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Durham, NC, United States of America; Duke University, Department of Neurobiology, Durham, NC, United States of America; Duke University, Department of Surgery, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Duke University · US

Funding

Temporal Patterns of Deep Brain StimulationR01NS040894 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GRILL, WARREN M. · 2000 to 2013
$3.4M
Optimal Electrode Geometries for Efficient and Selective Deep Brain StimulationF31NS079105 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HOWELL, BRYAN · 2012 to 2014
$83k
NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS079105NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS040894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an alternative or adjunct therapy to treat chronic pain, a prevalent and clinically challenging condition. Although SCS has substantial clinical success, the therapy is still prone to failures, including lead breakage, lead migration, and poor pain relief. The goal of this study was to develop a computational model of SCS and use the model to compare activation of neural elements during intradural and extradural electrode placement. We constructed five patient-specific models of SCS. Stimulation thresholds predicted by the model were compared to stimulation thresholds measured intraoperatively, and we used these models to quantify the efficiency and selectivity of intradural and extradural SCS. Intradural placement dramatically increased stimulation efficiency and reduced the power required to stimulate the dorsal columns by more than 90%. Intradural placement also increased selectivity, allowing activation of a greater proportion of dorsal column fibers before spread of activation to dorsal root fibers, as well as more selective activation of individual dermatomes at different lateral deviations from the midline. Further, the results suggest that current electrode designs used for extradural SCS are not optimal for intradural SCS, and a novel azimuthal tripolar design increased stimulation selectivity, even beyond that achieved with an intradural paddle array. Increased stimulation efficiency is expected to increase the battery life of implantable pulse generators, increase the recharge interval of rechargeable implantable pulse generators, and potentially reduce stimulator volume. The greater selectivity of intradural stimulation may improve the success rate of SCS by mitigating the sensitivity of pain relief to malpositioning of the electrode. The outcome of this effort is a better quantitative understanding of how intradural electrode placement can potentially increase the selectivity and efficiency of SCS, which, in turn, provides predictions that can be tested in future clinical studies assessing the potential therapeutic benefits of intradural SCS.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalSpinal Cord StimulationElectric ConductivityElectrodesFinite Element AnalysisHumansParesthesiaSpinal Cord

Identifiers

PMID25536035
PMCPMC4275184
OpenAlexW1985006454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.