Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25535585›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2015

The effect of lymphadenectomy and radiotherapy on recurrence and survival in endometrial carcinoma. Experience in a population reference centre.

Meritxell Arenas, Marina Gascón, Àngels Rovirosa, Víctor Hernández, Francesc Riu, Iolanda López, Angel Montero, Sebastià Sabater

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Haemoglobin monitoring in endometrial cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2017
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Meritxell ArenasRadiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Institut d'Investigacions Sanitàries Pere Virgili (IISPV), Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV), Tarragona, Spain.
Marina GascónRadiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Institut d'Investigacions Sanitàries Pere Virgili (IISPV), Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV), Tarragona, Spain.
Àngels RovirosaGynaecologic Cancer Unit, Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Clínic de Malalties Hematològiques i Oncològiques (ICMHO), Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
Víctor HernándezMedical Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, IISPV, Spain.
Francesc RiuPathology Department, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, IISPV, Spain.
Iolanda LópezRadiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Institut d'Investigacions Sanitàries Pere Virgili (IISPV), Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV), Tarragona, Spain.
Angel MonteroRadiation Oncology Department, Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Sebastià SabaterRadiation Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Albacete (CHUA), Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the effect of lymphadenectomy and/or radiotherapy on recurrence and survival patterns in endometrial carcinoma (EC) in a radiotherapy reference centre population. MATERIAL AND

methodsA retrospective population-based review was conducted on 261 patients with stages I-III EC. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out. Both recurrence and survival were analysed according to patient age, FIGO stage, tumour size, myometrial invasion, tumour grade, lymphadenectomy, external beam irradiation (EBI), and brachytherapy (BT).

resultsMedian age: 64.8 years. Median follow-up: 151 months. The following treatments were administered: surgery, 97.32%; lymph-node dissection, 54.4%; radiotherapy, 162 patients (62%) (EBI and BT: 64.1%, BT alone: 30.2%, EBI alone: 5.6%). Twenty-six patients (9.96%) suffered loco-regional recurrence, whilst 27 (10.34%) suffered distant failure. The 5-year overall survival (OS) for all stages was 80.1%. The 5-year disease free survival (DFS) was 92.1% for all patients. The 10-year DFS was 89.9%. The independent significant prognostic factors for a good outcome identified through the multivariate analysis were: age <75 years (p = 0.001); tumour size ≤2 cm (p = 0.003); myometrial invasion ≤50% (p = 0.011); lymphadenectomy (p = 0.02); EBI (p = 0.001); and BT (p = 0.031). Toxicity occurred in 114 of the 162 patients who received radiotherapy (70.5%). The toxicity was mainly acute, and late in only 28.3% (n = 45) of cases. The majority experienced G1-2 toxicity, and only 3% of patients experienced G3 late toxicity (5/162).

conclusionsOur results suggest that age <75 years, tumour size ≤2 cm, myometrial invasion ≤50%, lymphadenectomy, EBI, and BT, are predictors of a good outcome in EC.

Indexed as

Endometrial carcinomaLymphadenectomyPrognostic factorsRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID25535585
PMCPMC4268591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.