Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25535496›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences2014

Effect of a multispecies probiotic on inflammatory markers in critically ill patients: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Sarvin Sanaie, Mehrangiz Ebrahimi-Mameghani, Hadi Hamishehkar, Mojtaba Mojtahedzadeh, Ata Mahmoodpoor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Probiotics in Critically Ill Patients: An Umbrella Review.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarvin SanaieDepartment of Community Nutrition, Faculty of Nutrition, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mehrangiz Ebrahimi-MameghaniDepartment of Community Nutrition, Nutrition Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Hadi HamishehkarDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Applied Drug Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mojtaba MojtahedzadehDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ata MahmoodpoorDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImpairment of intestinal barrier function and increased translocation of bacteria to the systemic blood flow contribute to the emergence of sepsis. Probiotics might be of beneficial effects on critically ill-patients, modulating intestinal barrier function and reducing inflammation. The aim of this trial was to determine the effect of probiotics on inflammatory markers in critically ill-patients in Intensive Care Unit (ICU). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis trial was conducted on 40 critically ill-patients admitted to the ICU. Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or probiotic containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium and Streptococcus thermophilus (VSL#3) for 7 days. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and systemic concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT) and protein C were measured before initiation of the study and on days 4 and 7.

resultsA significant difference in IL-6 (P = 0.003), PCT (P = 0.014) and protein C (P < 0.001) levels, and also APACHE II and SOFA scores (P < 0.001) was seen over the treatment period between two groups. Moreover, there was a significant decrease in serum IL-6 levels (from 211.85 ± 112.76 to 71.80 ± 28.41) (P < 0.001) and PCT levels (from 1.67 ± 1.27 to 0.47 ± 0.41) (P < 0.001) and a significant increase in serum protein C levels (from 7.47 ± 3.61 to 12.87 ± 3.63) (P < 0.001) in probiotic group during the study.

conclusionProbiotics could reduce inflammation in critically ill-patients and might be considered as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of critically ill-patients.

Indexed as

Inflammationprobioticssepsis

Identifiers

PMID25535496
PMCPMC4268190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.