ReviewIndian journal of anaesthesia2014
Blood transfusion practices in liver transplantation.
Review in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultra-massive fluid transfusion in adult liver transplant recipients: A single center observational study.PloS one · 2025Observational
- Assessment of the need for routine intraoperative cell salvage in liver transplantation.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2023Article
- Impact of intraoperative blood salvage and autologous transfusion during liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Article
- Correlation between thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry values in adult liver transplant recipients.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2020Article
- [Anesthesiological aspects of liver transplantation].Der Anaesthesist · 2019Article
- Intraoperative cell salvage with autologous transfusion in liver transplantation.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2019Review
- Blood transfusion practices in liver transplantation.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2015Article
- Patient blood management in India - Review of current practices and feasibility of applying appropriate standard of care guidelines. A position paper by an interdisciplinary expert group.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyReview
- Predictors of early recipient mortality after living donor liver transplantation in a tertiary care center in Egypt.Annals of Saudi medicineArticle
- Evaluation of correlation between etiology of end stage liver disease and intraoperative utilization of blood products during liver transplantation.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
- Coagulopathy during liver transplantation.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood loss and blood transfusion have been inherently associated with liver transplantation. Bleeding has been attributed to the various factors which are associated with chronic liver dysfunction. Various surgical and anaesthetic strategies have been developed over the years to reduce bleeding and also to optimise the usage of various blood and blood products perioperatively. The present day success of liver transplantation can be attributed to these issues where transfusion practices have changed. Although several centres are successfully performing liver transplantations in large numbers, there is still a large variability in the usage of blood and blood products perioperatively among the institutions and even among different anaesthesiologists from the same institution. The present article deals with the various factors confounding this concept of blood transfusion practices and the various strategies adopted to reduce the transfusion requirements in the perioperative period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.