Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25535374›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Evolutionary meandering of intermolecular interactions along the drift barrier.

Michael Lynch, Kyle Hagner

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Environment-Dependent Regulatory Landscape of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Understanding developmental system drift.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The fitness cost of spurious phosphorylation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Microbial population dynamics decouple growth response from environmental nutrient concentration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evolution in small steps and giant leaps.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael LynchDepartments of Biology and milynch@indiana.edu.
Kyle HagnerPhysics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47401.
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

The Rate and Molecular Spectrum of Spontaneous MutationsR01GM036827 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI LYNCH, MICHAEL R · 1988 to 2016
$5.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM036827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many cellular functions depend on highly specific intermolecular interactions, for example transcription factors and their DNA binding sites, microRNAs and their RNA binding sites, the interfaces between heterodimeric protein molecules, the stems in RNA molecules, and kinases and their response regulators in signal-transduction systems. Despite the need for complementarity between interacting partners, such pairwise systems seem to be capable of high levels of evolutionary divergence, even when subject to strong selection. Such behavior is a consequence of the diminishing advantages of increasing binding affinity between partners, the multiplicity of evolutionary pathways between selectively equivalent alternatives, and the stochastic nature of evolutionary processes. Because mutation pressure toward reduced affinity conflicts with selective pressure for greater interaction, situations can arise in which the expected distribution of the degree of matching between interacting partners is bimodal, even in the face of constant selection. Although biomolecules with larger numbers of interacting partners are subject to increased levels of evolutionary conservation, their more numerous partners need not converge on a single sequence motif or be increasingly constrained in more complex systems. These results suggest that most phylogenetic differences in the sequences of binding interfaces are not the result of adaptive fine tuning but a simple consequence of random genetic drift.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAmino Acid MotifsBinding SitesMacromolecular SubstancesMutationTranscription FactorsMacromolecular SubstancesTranscription Factorscellular evolutioncoevolutionmolecular interactionrandom genetic drifttranscription

Identifiers

PMID25535374
PMCPMC4291652
OpenAlexW2065362852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.