ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2015
A Bayesian framework for de novo mutation calling in parents-offspring trios.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
74 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.
- SLC12A ion transporter mutations in sporadic and familial human congenital hydrocephalus.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2019Trial
- The genetic landscape of hypospadias: clinical insights into inherited and de novo risk factors.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Article
- Genomic landscape of rare variants in a Chinese autism cohort and discovery of novel risk genes.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- The oligogenic inheritance test GCOD detects risk genes and their interactions in congenital heart defects.Genome research · 2026Article
- Improved discovery of de novo mutations using TrioDNM and VRFS.GigaScience · 2026Article
- A practical framework for predicting splicing single nucleotide variants in exome sequencing.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Non-recurrent duplications on chromosome 4p16.1 involving cis-regulatory elements affecting neural crest development in patients with isolated bilateral microtia.Human genetics · 2025Article
- Recessive genomic and phenotypic variation in consanguineous families with cerebral palsy.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Systematic evaluation of de novo mutation calling tools using whole genome sequencing data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Genome-wide Genetic Mutations Accumulated in Pigs Genome-edited for Xenotransplantation and Their Filial Generation.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Efficient identification of de novo mutations in family trios: a consensus-based informatic approach.Life science alliance · 2025Article
- De novo variants disrupt an LDB1-regulated transcriptional network in congenital ventriculomegaly.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Genomic analysis of 11,555 probands identifies 60 dominant congenital heart disease genes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Whole-genome sequencing analysis of Japanese autism spectrum disorder trios.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Article
- TRIM71 mutations cause a neurodevelopmental syndrome featuring ventriculomegaly and hydrocephalus.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Article
- A maternal germline mutator phenotype in a family affected by heritable colorectal cancer.Genetics · 2024Article
- A maternal germline mutator phenotype in a family affected by heritable colorectal cancer.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Post-implantation analysis of genomic variations in the progeny from developing fetus to birth.Human genomics · 2024Article
- A novel SMARCC1 BAFopathy implicates neural progenitor epigenetic dysregulation in human hydrocephalus.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Article
14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
motivationSpontaneous (de novo) mutations play an important role in the disease etiology of a range of complex diseases. Identifying de novo mutations (DNMs) in sporadic cases provides an effective strategy to find genes or genomic regions implicated in the genetics of disease. High-throughput next-generation sequencing enables genome- or exome-wide detection of DNMs by sequencing parents-proband trios. It is challenging to sift true mutations through massive amount of noise due to sequencing error and alignment artifacts. One of the critical limitations of existing methods is that for all genomic regions the same pre-specified mutation rate is assumed, which has a significant impact on the DNM calling accuracy.
resultsIn this study, we developed and implemented a novel Bayesian framework for DNM calling in trios (TrioDeNovo), which overcomes these limitations by disentangling prior mutation rates from evaluation of the likelihood of the data so that flexible priors can be adjusted post-hoc at different genomic sites. Through extensively simulations and application to real data we showed that this new method has improved sensitivity and specificity over existing methods, and provides a flexible framework to further improve the efficiency by incorporating proper priors. The accuracy is further improved using effective filtering based on sequence alignment characteristics. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The C++ source code implementing TrioDeNovo is freely available at https://medschool.vanderbilt.edu/cgg. CONTACT: bingshan.li@vanderbilt.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.