Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25535082›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2014

Inhalation of silver nanomaterials--seeing the risks.

Ioannis G Theodorou, Mary P Ryan, Teresa D Tetley, Alexandra E Porter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Bactericidal and Cytotoxic Properties of Silver Nanoparticles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Gut Dysbiosis in Animals Due to Environmental Chemical Exposures.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ioannis G TheodorouDepartment of Materials and London Centre for Nanotechnology, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK. ioannis.theodorou10@imperial.ac.uk.
Mary P RyanDepartment of Materials and London Centre for Nanotechnology, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK. m.p.ryan@imperial.ac.uk.
Teresa D TetleyNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Cale Street, London SW3 6LY, UK. t.tetley@imperial.ac.uk.
Alexandra E PorterDepartment of Materials and London Centre for Nanotechnology, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK. a.porter@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

Scientific CoreU19ES019536 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TETLEY, TERESA DOROTHY, ZHANG, JUNFENG · 2010 to 2014
$4.6M
Medical Research Council G0700926NIEHS NIH HHS U19 ES019536NIEHS NIH HHS U19ES019536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Demand for silver engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) is increasing rapidly in optoelectronic and in health and medical applications due to their antibacterial, thermal, electrical conductive, and other properties. The continued commercial up-scaling of ENM production and application needs to be accompanied by an understanding of the occupational health, public safety and environmental implications of these materials. There have been numerous in vitro studies and some in vivo studies of ENM toxicity but their results are frequently inconclusive. Some of the variability between studies has arisen due to a lack of consistency between experimental models, since small differences between test materials can markedly alter their behaviour. In addition, the propensity for the physicochemistry of silver ENMs to alter, sometimes quite radically, depending on the environment they encounter, can profoundly alter their bioreactivity. Consequently, it is important to accurately characterise the materials before use, at the point of exposure and at the nanomaterial-tissue, or "nanobio", interface, to be able to appreciate their environmental impact. This paper reviews current literature on the pulmonary effects of silver nanomaterials. We focus our review on describing whether, and by which mechanisms, the chemistry and structure of these materials can be linked to their bioreactivity in the respiratory system. In particular, the mechanisms by which the physicochemical properties (e.g., aggregation state, morphology and chemistry) of silver nanomaterials change in various biological milieu (i.e., relevant proteins, lipids and other molecules, and biofluids, such as lung surfactant) and affect subsequent interactions with and within cells will be discussed, in the context not only of what is measured but also of what can be visualized.

Indexed as

NanostructuresSilverAnimalsEcotoxicologyHumansInhalation ExposureLung DiseasesRiskSilver

Identifiers

PMID25535082
PMCPMC4284799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.