Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25535047›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2015

The Relationship Between the Perceived Risk of Harm by a Family Member with Mental Illness and the Family Experience.

Judith Katz, Deborah Medoff, Li Juan Fang, Lisa B Dixon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Conceptual Model for Strengthening Family Capabilities Through a Process of Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Better off with you: Exploring congruity between caregivers' and Veterans' experience of efforts to cope with suicide.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Judith KatzDepartment of Psychiatry, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, 2nd Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Deborah MedoffUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, 737 West Lombard St, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Li Juan FangUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, 737 West Lombard St, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Lisa B DixonNew York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Medical Center, Room 2702, 1051 Riverside Drive, Box 100, New York, NY, 10032, USA. DixonLi@nyspi.columbia.edu.

Funding

A Randomized Trial of Family to Family EducationR01MH072667 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI DIXON, LISA B. · 2005 to 2008
$2.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH072667
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Family members of people with serious mental illness (SMI) at times report that they act to stop their ill relative from self harm or harming others. This study examines the relationship between the perception of risk of harm and family distress, burden, empowerment, coping, physical and mental health, appraisal of the caregiving experience, family communication, and family functioning. The study is a secondary analysis of baseline data collected for a randomized study of the family-to-family peer driven education program (FTF). Four hundred thirty-four enrolled individuals who were seeking to participate in FTF completed survey items that asked if they had tried to stop or prevent their ill family member from harming themselves or others in the last 30 days. Participants who perceived a recent risk of harm by their ill relative reported more negative appraisals of caregiving, greater psychological distress, poorer mental health and greater objective burden compared with those who did not perceive a recent risk of harm. The results suggest that families of persons with SMI should be asked about perceived risk of harm to self and others, and the presence of perceived risk of harm should serve as a red flag indicating the need for further evaluation of the family experience and additional support for the family.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalStress, PsychologicalAdultCaregiversFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPerceptionPower, PsychologicalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf-Injurious BehaviorSickness Impact ProfileSurveys and QuestionnairesBurdenDistressFamilyHarmSevere mental illnessSuicideViolence

Identifiers

PMID25535047
PMCPMC4478288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.