Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25535019›Full record

ReviewPsychological research2016

A review of ideomotor approaches to perception, cognition, action, and language: advancing a cultural recycling hypothesis.

Arnaud Badets, Iring Koch, Andrea M Philipp

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Psychological research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Learning and transfer of response-effect relations.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Compatibility effects with touchless gestures.Experimental brain research · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Creating semantics in tool use.Cognitive processing · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Arnaud BadetsCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), UMR-7295, Maison des Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société, Bât A5; 5, rue Théodore Lefebvre, 86000, Poitiers, France. arnaud.badets@univ-poitiers.fr.
Iring KochInstitute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Andrea M PhilippInstitute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DECentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et Technique (CNRST) · MA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term "cultural recycling" derives from the neuronal recycling hypothesis, which suggests that representations of cultural inventions like written words, Arabic numbers, or tools can occupy brain areas dedicated to other functions. In the present selective review article, we propose a recycling hypothesis for the ideomotor mechanism. The ideomotor approach assumes that motor actions are controlled by the anticipation of the expected perceptual consequences that they aim to generate in the environment. Arguably, such action-perception mechanisms contribute to motor behaviour for human and non-human animals since millions of years. However, recent empirical studies suggest that the ideomotor mechanism can also contribute to word processing, number representation, and arithmetic. For instance, it has been shown that the anticipatory simulation of abstract semantics, like the numerical quantitative value of three items can prime processing of the associated Arabic number "3". Arabic numbers, words, or tools represent cultural inventions, so that, from a theoretical perspective, we suggest an ideomotor recycling hypothesis for the interaction with such artefacts. In this view, the ideomotor mechanism spreads its influence to other functions beyond motor control, and is recycled to flexibly adapt different human behaviours towards dealing with more abstract concepts.

Indexed as

LanguageAnimalsBrainCognitionCultureHumansMotor ActivityPerceptionSemantics

Identifiers

PMID25535019
OpenAlexW2076523707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.