Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25534727›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Multicenter, randomized clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of LFF571 and vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infections.

Kathleen Mullane, Christine Lee, Adam Bressler, Martha Buitrago, Karl Weiss, Kristina Dabovic, Jens Praestgaard, Jennifer A Leeds, Johanne Blais, Peter Pertel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01232595 (Multi-center, Randomized, Evaluator-blind, Active-controlled,Parallel-group Design to Determine Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Multiple Daily Administration of LFF571 for 10 Days in Patients With Moderate Clostridium Difficile Infections), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01232595 phase2completednot on this map

Multi-center, Randomized, Evaluator-blind, Active-controlled,Parallel-group Design to Determine Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Multiple Daily Administration of LFF571 for 10 Days in Patients With Moderate Clostridium Difficile Infections

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2010 to 2013Enrolled109ConditionsModerate Clostridium Difficile InfectionArmsLFF571, Vancomycin (POC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The genus Nocardia as a source of new antimicrobials.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Therapies from Thiopeptides.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  15. Are Antimicrobial Peptides a 21st-Century Solution for Atopic Dermatitis?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Antibacterial Thiopeptide GE2270-Congeners fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Prospects for Antibacterial Discovery and Development.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Kathleen MullaneThe University of Chicago Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Christine LeeSt. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program, McMaster University, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Adam BresslerInfectious Disease Specialists of Atlanta, Decatur, Georgia, USA.
Martha BuitragoIdaho Falls Infectious Disease, Idaho Falls, Idaho, USA.
Karl WeissUniversité de Montréal, Département de Microbiologie et d'Infectiologie, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Kristina DabovicNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Infectious Disease Area, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Jens PraestgaardNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Jennifer A LeedsNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Infectious Disease Area, Emeryville, California, USA.
Johanne BlaisNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Infectious Disease Area, Emeryville, California, USA.
Peter PertelNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Infectious Disease Area, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA peter.pertel@novartis.com.
Novartis (United States) · USGeorgia Cancer Specialists · USHamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program · CANovartis (Switzerland) · CHUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Re-Engineering Translational Research at the University of ChicagoUL1TR000430 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SOLWAY, JULIAN · 2012 to 2016
$20.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clostridium difficile infection causes serious diarrheal disease. Although several drugs are available for treatment, including vancomycin, recurrences remain a problem. LFF571 is a semisynthetic thiopeptide with potency against C. difficile in vitro. In this phase 2 exploratory study, we compared the safety and efficacy (based on a noninferiority analysis) of LFF571 to those of vancomycin used in adults with primary episodes or first recurrences of moderate C. difficile infection. Patients were randomized to receive 200 mg of LFF571 or 125 mg of vancomycin four times daily for 10 days. The primary endpoint was the proportion of clinical cures at the end of therapy in the per-protocol population. Secondary endpoints included clinical cures at the end of therapy in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, the time to diarrhea resolution, and the recurrence rate. Seventy-two patients were randomized, with 46 assigned to receive LFF571. Based on the protocol-specified definition, the rate of clinical cure for LFF571 (90.6%) was noninferior to that of vancomycin (78.3%). The 30-day sustained cure rates for LFF571 and vancomycin were 56.7% and 65.0%, respectively, in the per-protocol population and 58.7% and 60.0%, respectively, in the modified intent-to-treat population. Using toxin-confirmed cases only, the recurrence rates were lower for LFF571 (19% versus 25% for vancomycin in the per-protocol population). LFF571 was generally safe and well tolerated. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was higher for LFF571 (76.1% versus 69.2% for vancomycin), although more AEs in the vancomycin group were suspected to be related to the study drug (38.5% versus 32.6% for LFF571). One patient receiving LFF571 discontinued the study due to an AE. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01232595.).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeptides, CyclicThiazolesVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsLFF571Peptides, CyclicThiazolesVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID25534727
PMCPMC4325808
OpenAlexW2051510344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.