Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015
Multicenter, randomized clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of LFF571 and vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infections.
Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01232595 (Multi-center, Randomized, Evaluator-blind, Active-controlled,Parallel-group Design to Determine Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Multiple Daily Administration of LFF571 for 10 Days in Patients With Moderate Clostridium Difficile Infections), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multi-center, Randomized, Evaluator-blind, Active-controlled,Parallel-group Design to Determine Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Multiple Daily Administration of LFF571 for 10 Days in Patients With Moderate Clostridium Difficile Infections
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Pharmacokinetics of LFF571 and vancomycin in patients with moderate Clostridium difficile infections.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2015Trial
- A Framework for the In Vivo Production of Extensively Engineered Thiopeptides.ACS synthetic biology · 2026Article
- From Membrane Composition to Antimicrobial Strategies: Experimental and Computational Approaches to AMP Design and Selectivity.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Sequence modeling tools to decode the biosynthetic diversity of the human microbiome.mSystems · 2025Review
- Commercial utilization of bacteriocins: tackling challenges and exploring their potential as alternatives to antibiotics.Future microbiology · 2025Review
- Designing a Multi-Epitope Vaccine Against MPXV and HIV Based on an Immunoinformatic Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- The genus Nocardia as a source of new antimicrobials.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2025Review
- Genomic insights into Thermomonas hydrothermalis: potential applications in industrial biotechnology.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Bacteriocin diversity, function, discovery and application as antimicrobials.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024Review
- Recent advances in fecal microbiota transplantation forFrontiers in microbiomes · 2024Review
- Microbiota, natural products, and human health: exploring interactions for therapeutic insights.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Review
- Design methods for antimicrobial peptides with improved performance.Zoological research · 2023Review
- Therapies from Thiopeptides.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Are Antimicrobial Peptides a 21st-Century Solution for Atopic Dermatitis?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Antimicrobial Peptides in Infectious Diseases and Beyond-A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Recent Advances in Discovery, Bioengineering, and Bioactivity-Evaluation of Ribosomally Synthesized and Post-translationally Modified Peptides.ACS bio & med chem Au · 2023Review
- Microbial derived antimicrobial peptides as potential therapeutics in atopic dermatitis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Antibacterial Thiopeptide GE2270-Congeners fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Prospects for Antibacterial Discovery and Development.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Clostridium difficile infection causes serious diarrheal disease. Although several drugs are available for treatment, including vancomycin, recurrences remain a problem. LFF571 is a semisynthetic thiopeptide with potency against C. difficile in vitro. In this phase 2 exploratory study, we compared the safety and efficacy (based on a noninferiority analysis) of LFF571 to those of vancomycin used in adults with primary episodes or first recurrences of moderate C. difficile infection. Patients were randomized to receive 200 mg of LFF571 or 125 mg of vancomycin four times daily for 10 days. The primary endpoint was the proportion of clinical cures at the end of therapy in the per-protocol population. Secondary endpoints included clinical cures at the end of therapy in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, the time to diarrhea resolution, and the recurrence rate. Seventy-two patients were randomized, with 46 assigned to receive LFF571. Based on the protocol-specified definition, the rate of clinical cure for LFF571 (90.6%) was noninferior to that of vancomycin (78.3%). The 30-day sustained cure rates for LFF571 and vancomycin were 56.7% and 65.0%, respectively, in the per-protocol population and 58.7% and 60.0%, respectively, in the modified intent-to-treat population. Using toxin-confirmed cases only, the recurrence rates were lower for LFF571 (19% versus 25% for vancomycin in the per-protocol population). LFF571 was generally safe and well tolerated. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was higher for LFF571 (76.1% versus 69.2% for vancomycin), although more AEs in the vancomycin group were suspected to be related to the study drug (38.5% versus 32.6% for LFF571). One patient receiving LFF571 discontinued the study due to an AE. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01232595.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.