Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015
Pharmacokinetics of LFF571 and vancomycin in patients with moderate Clostridium difficile infections.
Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01232595 (Multi-center, Randomized, Evaluator-blind, Active-controlled,Parallel-group Design to Determine Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Multiple Daily Administration of LFF571 for 10 Days in Patients With Moderate Clostridium Difficile Infections), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multi-center, Randomized, Evaluator-blind, Active-controlled,Parallel-group Design to Determine Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Multiple Daily Administration of LFF571 for 10 Days in Patients With Moderate Clostridium Difficile Infections
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multicenter, randomized clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of LFF571 and vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infections.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2015Trial
- From Membrane Composition to Antimicrobial Strategies: Experimental and Computational Approaches to AMP Design and Selectivity.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Commercial utilization of bacteriocins: tackling challenges and exploring their potential as alternatives to antibiotics.Future microbiology · 2025Review
- Fighting Antimicrobial Resistance: Innovative Drugs in Antibacterial Research.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Review
- Bacteriocin diversity, function, discovery and application as antimicrobials.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024Review
- Thiopeptides: antibiotics with unique chemical structures and diverse biological activities.The Journal of antibiotics · 2021Review
- Investigational Treatment Agents for RecurrentJournal of experimental pharmacology · 2020Review
- Novel therapies and preventative strategies for primary and recurrent Clostridium difficile infections.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2019Review
- Novel Antimicrobials for the Treatment ofFrontiers in medicine · 2018Review
- Elucidating and engineering thiopeptide biosynthesis.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2017Review
- YcaO-Dependent Posttranslational Amide Activation: Biosynthesis, Structure, and Function.Chemical reviews · 2017Review
- Treatment of pediatricInfection and drug resistance · 2017Review
- Antibacterials Developed to Target a Single Organism: Mechanisms and Frequencies of Reduced Susceptibility to the Novel Anti-Clostridium difficile Compounds Fidaxomicin and LFF571.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2016Review
- In Vitro Biosynthesis of the Core Scaffold of the Thiopeptide Thiomuracin.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2015Article
- Identification and Functional Analysis of the Nocardithiocin Gene Cluster in Nocardia pseudobrasiliensis.PloS one · 2015Article
- Antibiotic therapy and Clostridium difficile infection - primum non nocere - first do no harm.Infection and drug resistance · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Clostridium difficile infection causes diarrheal disease with potentially fatal complications. Although treatments are available, including vancomycin, metronidazole, and fidaxomicin, the recurrence of disease after therapy remains a problem. LFF571 is a novel thiopeptide antibacterial that shows in vitro potency against C. difficile that is comparable to or greater than that of other clinically used antibiotics. Here, we compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of LFF571 and vancomycin in patients with C. difficile infection as part of an early efficacy study. This multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blind, and active-controlled study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of LFF571 in adults with primary episodes or first relapses of moderate C. difficile infections. Patients were randomized to receive 200 mg of LFF571 or 125 mg of vancomycin four times daily for 10 days. The PK parameters were calculated from drug concentrations measured in serum and fecal samples. The systemic exposure following oral administration of 200 mg of LFF571 four times per day for 10 days in patients with C. difficile infection was limited. The highest LFF571 serum concentration observed was 41.7 ng/ml, whereas the levels in feces at the end of treatment were between 107 and 12,900 μg/g. In comparison, the peak vancomycin level observed in serum was considerably higher, at 2.73 μg/ml; the levels of vancomycin in feces were not measured. Similar to healthy volunteers, patients with C. difficile infections exhibited high fecal concentrations and low serum levels of LFF571. These results are consistent with the retention of LFF571 in the lumen of the gastrointestinal tract. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01232595.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.