ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2015
Complications after laparotomy for trauma: a retrospective analysis in a level I trauma centre.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emergency laparotomies in trauma management: a six-year case series.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Assessing the outcomes and complications of abdominal trauma using the adapted Clavien-Dindo in trauma scoring system in a tertiary hospital: an observational study.Journal of trauma and injury · 2025Article
- A characterization of trauma laparotomies in a scandinavian setting: an observational study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2022Observational
- A Descriptive Study on the Usage of Exploratory Laparotomy for Trauma Patients.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2020Article
- Trends in the Nature and Management of Serious Abdominal Trauma.World journal of surgery · 2019Article
- Outcome of trauma-related emergency laparotomies, in an era of far-reaching specialization.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2019Article
- A Randomized Controlled Trial on Intra-Abdominal Irrigation during Emergency Trauma Laparotomy; Time for Yet Another Paradigm Shift.Bulletin of emergency and trauma · 2018Article
- An adapted Clavien-Dindo scoring system in trauma as a clinically meaningful nonmortality endpoint.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2017Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLaparotomy is a potential life-saving procedure after traumatic abdominal injury. There is limited literature about morbidity and mortality rates after trauma laparotomy. The primary aim of this study is to describe the complications which may occur due to laparotomy for trauma.
methodsRetrospective evaluated single-centre study with data registry up to 1 year after initial laparotomy for trauma was performed in a level 1 trauma centre in The Netherlands. Between January 2000 and January 2011, a total of 2390 severely injured trauma patients (ISS ≥ 16) were transported to the VUMC. Patient demographics; mechanism of injury; injury patterns defined by Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Revised Trauma Score (RTS); surgical interventions and findings; and morbidity and mortality were documented.
resultsA total of 92 trauma patients who underwent a trauma laparotomy met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 71 % were male. Median age was 37 years. Median ISS was 27. Mechanisms of injury comprised of car accidents (20 %), fall from height (17 %), motorcycle accidents (12 %), pedestrian/cyclist hit by a vehicle (9 %) and other in three patients (5 %). Penetrating injuries accounted for 37 % of the injuries, consisting of stab wounds (21 %) and gunshot wounds (16 %). Complications classified by the Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications showed grade I complications in 21 patients (23 %), grade II in 36 patients (39 %), grade III in 21 patients (23 %), grade IV in 2 patients (2 %) and grade V in 16 patients (17 %).
conclusionLaparotomy for trauma has a high complication rate resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Most events occur in the early postoperative period. Further prospective research needs to be conducted in order to identify possibilities to improve care in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.