ArticleJournal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR2015
Comparison of combination therapies in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: transarterial chemoembolization with radiofrequency ablation versus microwave ablation.
Article in Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Value of VEGF in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Sorafenib: A Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015Pooled it
- Anatomic sub-segmentectomy with single-session combined transcatheter arterial embolization/microwave ablation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: preliminary results.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Loco-regional therapies competing with radiofrequency ablation in potential indications for hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2023Article
- Optimal treatment for small HCC (<3 cm): Resection, liver transplantation, or locoregional therapy?JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2023Review
- Bench-to-bedside development of multifunctional flexible embolic agents.Theranostics · 2023Review
- Thermal ablation alone vs thermal ablation combined with transarterial chemoembolization for patients with small (<3 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma.Clinical imaging · 2021Article
- Locoregional Therapy Approaches for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Recent Advances and Management Strategies.Cancers · 2020Review
- A review of conventional and newer generation microwave ablation systems for hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2020Review
- Curative-Intent Therapies in Localized Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2020Review
- Simultaneous transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation for large hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Article
- Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined With Microwave Ablation vs. Combined With Cryoablation.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Locoregional treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current evidence and future directions.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019Review
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Combined Transarterial Chemoembolization and Ablation.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2019Review
- Microwave ablation compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.OncoTargets and therapy · 2019Article
- Evaluation of the Heat Sink Effect After Transarterial Embolization When Performed in Combination with Thermal Ablation of the Liver in a Rabbit Model.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2018Article
- Microwave ablation in primary and secondary liver tumours: technical and clinical approaches.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2017Review
- Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Either Radiofrequency or Microwave Ablation in Management of Hepatocellular CarcinomaAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2017Article
- Locoregional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: The best is yet to come.World journal of radiology · 2015Article
- Liver Ablation: Best Practice.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2015Review
- New frontiers in endovascular therapies for locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.Radiologia brasileiraArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare retrospectively the outcomes and complications of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting embolic agents combined with radiofrequency (RF) ablation or microwave (MW) ablation in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom 2003-2011, 89 patients with HCC received a combination therapy-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus RF ablation in 38 patients and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus MW ablation in 51 patients. Local tumor response, tumor progression-free survival (PFS), overall PFS, overall survival (OS), and complications were compared. Overall PFS and OS were compared between the two treatment groups in multivariate analysis controlling for Child-Pugh class, Barcelona Clinic Liver Classification stage, and index tumor size.
resultsComplete local tumor response was achieved in 37 (80.4%) of the tumors treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus RF ablation and 49 (76.6%) of the tumors treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus MW ablation (P = .67). The median tumor PFS and overall PFS were 20.8 months and 9.3 months (P = .72) for transarterial chemoembolization plus RF ablation and 21.8 months and 9.2 months for transarterial chemoembolization plus MW ablation (P = .32). The median OS of the transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus RF ablation group was 23.3 months, and the median OS of the transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus MW ablation group was 42.6 months, with no significant difference in the survival experience between the two groups (log-rank test, P = .10). In the multivariate analysis, Barcelona Clinic Liver Classification stage was the only factor associated with overall PFS and OS. One patient in the transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus RF ablation cohort (3%) and two patients in the transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus MW ablation cohort (4%) required prolonged hospitalization (< 48 h) for pain management after the procedure (P = 1.00).
conclusionsBased on similar safety and efficacy outcomes, both combination therapies, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus RF ablation and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus MW ablation, are effective treatments for HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.