Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25534365›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing2014

Forward-masking recovery and the assumptions of the temporal masking curve method of inferring cochlear compression.

Patricia Pérez-González, Peter T Johannesen, Enrique A Lopez-Poveda

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patricia Pérez-GonzálezInstituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain Grupo de Audiología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Peter T JohannesenInstituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain Grupo de Audiología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Enrique A Lopez-PovedaInstituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain Grupo de Audiología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain ealopezpoveda@usal.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The temporal masking curve (TMC) method is a behavioral technique for inferring human cochlear compression. The method relies on the assumptions that in the absence of compression, forward-masking recovery is independent of masker level and probe frequency. The present study aimed at testing the validity of these assumptions. Masking recovery was investigated for eight listeners with sensorineural hearing loss carefully selected to have absent or nearly absent distortion product otoacoustic emissions. It is assumed that for these listeners basilar membrane responses are linear, hence that masking recovery is independent of basilar membrane compression. TMCs for probe frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 kHz were available for these listeners from a previous study. The dataset included TMCs for masker frequencies equal to the probe frequencies plus reference TMCs measured using a high-frequency probe and a low, off-frequency masker. All of the TMCs were fitted using linear regression, and the resulting slope and intercept values were taken as indicative of masking recovery and masker level, respectively. Results for on-frequency TMCs suggest that forward-masking recovery is generally independent of probe frequency and of masker level and hence that it would be reasonable to use a reference TMC for a high-frequency probe to infer cochlear compression at lower frequencies. Results further show, however, that reference TMCs were sometimes shallower than corresponding on-frequency TMCs for identical probe frequencies, hence that compression could be overestimated in these cases. We discuss possible reasons for this result and the conditions when it might occur.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionPerceptual MaskingAcoustic StimulationAgedAged, 80 and overAudiometry, Pure-ToneAuditory ThresholdCochleaFemaleHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousTime Factorscochlear nonlinearityDPOAEsmiddle-ear muscle reflexotoacoustic emissions

Identifiers

PMID25534365
PMCPMC4299367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.