Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25534228›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2015

Role of visual input in the control of dynamic balance: variability and instability of gait in treadmill walking while blindfolded.

Fabienne Reynard, Philippe Terrier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fabienne ReynardClinique romande de réadaptation SUVACare, Av. Gd-Champsec 90, 1951, Sion, Switzerland.
Philippe Terrier

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While vision obviously plays an essential role in orienting and obstacle avoidance, its role in the regulation of dynamic balance is not yet fully understood. The objective of this study was to assess dynamic stability while blindfolded, under optimal conditions that minimized the fear of falling. The hypothesis was that visual deprivation could be compensated for by using other sensory strategies to stabilize gait. One hundred healthy adults (aged 20-69 years) participated in the study. They were previously accustomed to blindfolded treadmill walking wearing a safety harness. Their preferred walking speeds (PWS) were assessed with eyes open (PWSEO) and with eyes closed (blindfolded, PWSEC). Three five-minute tests were performed: (A) normal walking at PWSEO, (B) blindfolded walking at PWSEC, and (C) normal walking at PWSEC. Trunk acceleration was measured with a lightweight inertial sensor. Dynamic stability was assessed by using (1) acceleration root mean square (RMS), which estimates the variability of the signal, and hence, the smoothness of the trunk movement and (2) local dynamic stability (LDS), which reflects the efficiency of the motor control to stabilize the trunk. Although walking at PWSEC with eyes open (comparing conditions A and C) had a slight impact on gait stability (relative difference: RMS +4 %, LDS -5 %), no destabilizing effect of visual deprivation (B vs. C, RMS -4 %, LDS -1 %) was observed. Therefore, it is concluded that when reassuring conditions are offered to individuals while walking, they are able to adopt alternative sensory strategies to control dynamic equilibrium without the help of vision.

Indexed as

Nonlinear DynamicsSensory DeprivationAccelerationAdultAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaExercise TestFemaleGaitHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostural BalanceTouch PerceptionWalkingYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.