Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25534187›Full record

Trial reportEuropean neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology2015

Acute effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol and their combination on facial emotion recognition: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in cannabis users.

Chandni Hindocha, Tom P Freeman, Grainne Schafer, Chelsea Gardener, Ravi K Das, Celia J A Morgan, H Valerie Curran

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 178 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. A randomised controlled trial of vaporised ΔEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2019
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Cannabis Dampens the Effects of Music in Brain Regions Sensitive to Reward and Emotion.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chandni HindochaClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: c.hindocha@ucl.ac.uk.
Tom P FreemanClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, United Kingdom.
Grainne SchaferClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, United Kingdom.
Chelsea GardenerClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, United Kingdom.
Ravi K DasClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, United Kingdom.
Celia J A MorganClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, United Kingdom.
H Valerie CurranClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBThe London College · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K015524/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute administration of the primary psychoactive constituent of cannabis, Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), impairs human facial affect recognition, implicating the endocannabinoid system in emotional processing. Another main constituent of cannabis, cannabidiol (CBD), has seemingly opposite functional effects on the brain. This study aimed to determine the effects of THC and CBD, both alone and in combination on emotional facial affect recognition. 48 volunteers, selected for high and low frequency of cannabis use and schizotypy, were administered, THC (8mg), CBD (16mg), THC+CBD (8mg+16mg) and placebo, by inhalation, in a 4-way, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design. They completed an emotional facial affect recognition task including fearful, angry, happy, sad, surprise and disgust faces varying in intensity from 20% to 100%. A visual analogue scale (VAS) of feeling 'stoned' was also completed. In comparison to placebo, CBD improved emotional facial affect recognition at 60% emotional intensity; THC was detrimental to the recognition of ambiguous faces of 40% intensity. The combination of THC+CBD produced no impairment. Relative to placebo, both THC alone and combined THC+CBD equally increased feelings of being 'stoned'. CBD did not influence feelings of 'stoned'. No effects of frequency of use or schizotypy were found. In conclusion, CBD improves recognition of emotional facial affect and attenuates the impairment induced by THC. This is the first human study examining the effects of different cannabinoids on emotional processing. It provides preliminary evidence that different pharmacological agents acting upon the endocannabinoid system can both improve and impair recognition of emotional faces.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationCannabidiolCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodDronabinolDrug CombinationsDrug InteractionsEmotionsFacial RecognitionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMarijuana SmokingPhotic StimulationPsychotropic DrugsCannabidiolDronabinolDrug CombinationsPsychotropic DrugsCannabidiol (CBD)Emotional processingEndocannabinoid systemSchizotypyΔ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)

Identifiers

PMID25534187
PMCPMC4398332
OpenAlexW2061745435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.