Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25534069›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research2015

Neurocognitive insight, treatment utilization, and cognitive training outcomes in schizophrenia.

Cynthia Z Burton, Elizabeth W Twamley

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cynthia Z BurtonSan Diego State University and University of California, San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, 6363 Alvarado Court Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92120, USA.
Elizabeth W TwamleyUniversity of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry, 140 Arbor Drive, San Diego, CA 92103, USA; Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, VA San Diego Healthcare System, 3350 La Jolla Village Drive, San Diego, CA 92161, USA. Electronic address: etwamley@ucsd.edu.
University of California, San Diego · USVA San Diego Healthcare System · US

Funding

FELLOWSHIP IN GERIATRIC MENTAL HEALTHT32MH019934 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Elizabeth W Twamley · 1994 to 2026
$9.5M
Cognitive Training to Improve Work Outcomes in Severe Mental IllnessR01MH080150 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI TWAMLEY, ELIZABETH W · 2008 to 2012
$1.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080150NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019934NIMH NIH HHS T32MH019934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe degree to which people with schizophrenia show awareness of cognitive dysfunction and whether this neurocognitive insight affects treatment use or outcome is understudied. We aimed to examine neurocognitive insight among a treatment-seeking sample of patients with psychotic disorders, and whether neurocognitive insight affected treatment utilization or outcome.

method69 individuals with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders enrolled in a trial comparing Compensatory Cognitive Training (CCT) to standard pharmacotherapy. Participants with objective cognitive impairment were identified and grouped into "intact" vs. "impaired" neurocognitive insight groups. These groups were then compared via ANCOVA on three treatment utilization variables and six post-treatment cognitive/functional variables.

results43 participants demonstrated objective cognitive impairment. Among those individuals, 31 were considered to have intact neurocognitive insight and 12 showed impaired neurocognitive insight. These two groups did not differ on CCT attendance, satisfaction with the intervention, or self-reported cognitive strategy use at post-treatment. There were significant treatment group by neurocognitive insight group interactions for verbal memory and functional capacity outcomes, such that individuals with impaired neurocognitive insight who received treatment performed better than those who did not receive treatment.

conclusionsEven among individuals who self-select into a cognitive treatment study, many show minimal awareness of cognitive dysfunction. Impaired neurocognitive insight, however, was not associated with decreased treatment utilization, and was associated with positive treatment outcomes in some cognitive domains as well as functional capacity. As cognitive training treatments become increasingly available, impaired neurocognitive insight need not be a barrier to participation.

Indexed as

AwarenessSchizophrenic PsychologyCognition DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSchizophreniaSelf ConceptTreatment OutcomeAwarenessCognitionCognitive remediationFunctional capacityPsychosis

Identifiers

PMID25534069
PMCPMC4308482
OpenAlexW2092110889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.