ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2015
CVD prevention in 2014: Advances in the prevention of cardiovascular disease.
Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protective Effects of Fuziline on Dobutamine-Induced Heart Damage in Mice.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2023Article
- Can methods based on spot urine samples be used to estimate average population 24 h sodium excretion? Results from the Isfahan Salt Study.Public health nutrition · 2020Article
- Whole milk consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality: Isfahan Cohort Study.European journal of nutrition · 2019Article
- Lymphocytic subsets play distinct roles in heart diseases.Theranostics · 2019Review
- The association between dairy product intake and cardiovascular disease mortality in Chinese adults.European journal of nutrition · 2017Article
- Association of serum microRNA-21 levels with Visfatin, inflammation, and acute coronary syndromes.Heart and vessels · 2017Article
- The role of serum levels of microRNA-21 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 in patients with acute coronary syndrome.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25533802What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.