Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25533646›Full record

Trial reportGut2016

Randomised controlled trial of mesalazine in IBS.

Giovanni Barbara, Cesare Cremon, Vito Annese, Guido Basilisco, Franco Bazzoli, Massimo Bellini, Antonio Benedetti, Luigi Benini, Fabrizio Bossa, Paola Buldrini and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gut, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00626288 (A Randomised Controlled Multicenter Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Mesalazine Therapy in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome.), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00626288 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomised Controlled Multicenter Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Mesalazine Therapy in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSOFAR S.p.A.Ran2007 to 2012Enrolled187ConditionsIrritable Bowel SyndromeArmsMesalazine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Inflammation and Overlap of Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Functional Dyspepsia.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Giovanni BarbaraDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Centre for Applied Biomedical Research, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Cesare CremonDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Centre for Applied Biomedical Research, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Vito AnneseDivision of Gastroenterology SOD2, University Hospital Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Guido BasiliscoGastroenterology Unit, Ospedale Maggiore, Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Franco BazzoliGastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Massimo BelliniGastroenterology Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Antonio BenedettiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Luigi BeniniGastroenterology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Fabrizio BossaDivision of Gastroenterology, Casa Sollievo Sofferenza Hospital, IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Paola BuldriniGastroenterology Unit of Comacchio/Lagosanto, Ferrara, Italy.
Michele CicalaGastroenterology Unit, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Rosario CuomoDigestive Motility Diseases, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Bastianello GermanàGastroenterology Unit, S. Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy.
Paola MolteniGastroenterology Unit, Department of Clinical Science, "L. Sacco" University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Matteo NeriDepartment of Medicine and Aging Sciences and CESI, G. D'Annunzio University and Foundation, Chieti, Italy.
Marcello RodiGastroenterology Unit, St. Andrea Hospital, Vercelli, Italy.
Alfredo SaggioroDepartment of Digestive Diseases, Hepatology and Clinical Nutrition, Dell'Angelo Hospital, Venice, Italy.
Maria Lia ScribanoDivision of Gastroenterology, AO San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy.
Maurizio VecchiGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Giorgio ZoliSantissima Annunziata Hospital, Cento, Italy.
Roberto CorinaldesiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Centre for Applied Biomedical Research, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Vincenzo StanghelliniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Centre for Applied Biomedical Research, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
University of Bologna · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITCarlo Forlanini Hospital · ITCasa Sollievo della Sofferenza · ITCTO Andrea Alesini · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITIRCCS Policlinico San Donato · ITLuigi Sacco Hospital · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITOspedale dell' Angelo · ITOspedale Maggiore · ITPoliclinico S.Orsola-Malpighi · ITUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLow-grade intestinal inflammation plays a role in the pathophysiology of IBS. In this trial, we aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of mesalazine in patients with IBS.

designWe conducted a phase 3, multicentre, tertiary setting, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with Rome III confirmed IBS. Patients were randomly assigned to either mesalazine, 800 mg, or placebo, three times daily for 12 weeks, and were followed for additional 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was satisfactory relief of abdominal pain/discomfort for at least half of the weeks of the treatment period. The key secondary endpoint was satisfactory relief of overall IBS symptoms. Supportive analyses were also performed classifying as responders patients with a percentage of affirmative answers of at least 75% or >75% of time.

resultsA total of 185 patients with IBS were enrolled from 21 centres. For the primary endpoint, the responder patients were 68.6% in the mesalazine group versus 67.4% in the placebo group (p=0.870; 95% CI -12.8 to 15.1). In explorative analyses, with the 75% rule or >75% rule, the percentage of responders was greater in the mesalazine group with a difference over placebo of 11.6% (p=0.115; 95% CI -2.7% to 26.0%) and 5.9% (p=0.404; 95% CI -7.8% to 19.4%), respectively, although these differences were not significant. For the key secondary endpoint, overall symptoms improved in the mesalazine group and reached a significant difference of 15.1% versus placebo (p=0.032; 95% CI 1.5% to 28.7%) with the >75% rule.

conclusionsMesalazine treatment was not superior than placebo on the study primary endpoint. However, a subgroup of patients with IBS showed a sustained therapy response and benefits from a mesalazine therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClincialTrials.gov number, NCT00626288.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisIrritable Bowel SyndromeMaleMesalamineMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalMesalamineABDOMINAL PAINCLINICAL TRIALSGUT INFLAMMATIONINFLAMMATORY CELLSIRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME

Identifiers

PMID25533646
PMCPMC4717362
OpenAlexW2162033559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.