Trial reportGut2016
Randomised controlled trial of mesalazine in IBS.
Trial report in Gut, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00626288 (A Randomised Controlled Multicenter Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Mesalazine Therapy in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome.), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomised Controlled Multicenter Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Mesalazine Therapy in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomised clinical trial and meta-analysis: mesalazine treatment in irritable bowel syndrome-effects on gastrointestinal symptoms and rectal biomarkers of immune activity.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Randomised clinical trial: mesalazine versus placebo in the prevention of diverticulitis recurrence.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2017Trial
- Review
- Irritable bowel syndrome management: current insights.Singapore medical journal · 2026Article
- Mesalazine vs. IBS-D: Examining its impact on patient symptoms & stool calprotectin levels: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Insights into Mesalazine Use in Clinical Practice of Young Gastroenterologists.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Review
- MicroRNA-155-5p inhibition alleviates irritable bowel syndrome by increasing claudin-1 and ZO-1 expression.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Immune activation in irritable bowel syndrome: what is the evidence?Nature reviews. Immunology · 2022Review
- Mast cell mediation of visceral sensation and permeability in irritable bowel syndrome.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2022Review
- Functional bowel disorders with diarrhoea: Clinical guidelines of the United European Gastroenterology and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility.United European gastroenterology journal · 2022Review
- Current Treatment Options and Therapeutic Insights for Gastrointestinal Dysmotility and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Colonic Gene Expression and Fecal Microbiota in Diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Increased Toll-like Receptor 4 but Minimal Inflammation and no Response to Mesalazine.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2021Article
- Inflammation and Overlap of Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Functional Dyspepsia.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2021Review
- Confocal laser endomicroscopy detects colonic inflammation in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a prospective study.Endoscopy international open · 2020Article
- Therapeutic, Prophylactic, and Functional Use of Probiotics: A Current Perspective.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
- Twitter debate: controversies in functional gastrointestinal disorders.Frontline gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Utility of Diagnostic Tests in Children With Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
22 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveLow-grade intestinal inflammation plays a role in the pathophysiology of IBS. In this trial, we aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of mesalazine in patients with IBS.
designWe conducted a phase 3, multicentre, tertiary setting, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with Rome III confirmed IBS. Patients were randomly assigned to either mesalazine, 800 mg, or placebo, three times daily for 12 weeks, and were followed for additional 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was satisfactory relief of abdominal pain/discomfort for at least half of the weeks of the treatment period. The key secondary endpoint was satisfactory relief of overall IBS symptoms. Supportive analyses were also performed classifying as responders patients with a percentage of affirmative answers of at least 75% or >75% of time.
resultsA total of 185 patients with IBS were enrolled from 21 centres. For the primary endpoint, the responder patients were 68.6% in the mesalazine group versus 67.4% in the placebo group (p=0.870; 95% CI -12.8 to 15.1). In explorative analyses, with the 75% rule or >75% rule, the percentage of responders was greater in the mesalazine group with a difference over placebo of 11.6% (p=0.115; 95% CI -2.7% to 26.0%) and 5.9% (p=0.404; 95% CI -7.8% to 19.4%), respectively, although these differences were not significant. For the key secondary endpoint, overall symptoms improved in the mesalazine group and reached a significant difference of 15.1% versus placebo (p=0.032; 95% CI 1.5% to 28.7%) with the >75% rule.
conclusionsMesalazine treatment was not superior than placebo on the study primary endpoint. However, a subgroup of patients with IBS showed a sustained therapy response and benefits from a mesalazine therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClincialTrials.gov number, NCT00626288.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.