Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25533642›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2015

Genetic counseling content: How does it impact health behavior?

Kimberly M Kelly, Lee Ellington, Nancy Schoenberg, Thomas Jackson, Stephanie Dickinson, Kyle Porter, Howard Leventhal, Michael Andrykowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Genetic Testing in a Population-Based Sample of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Survivors from the REACH Randomized Trial: Cost Barriers and Moderators of Counseling Mode.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2017
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kimberly M KellyMary Babb Randolph Cancer Center and School of Pharmacy, Health Science Center, West Virginia University, PO Box 9510, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA. kmkelly@hsc.wvu.edu.
Lee EllingtonCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Nancy SchoenbergDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Thomas JacksonDepartment of Statistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Stephanie DickinsonDepartment of Statistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Kyle PorterCenter for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Howard LeventhalInstitute for Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Michael AndrykowskiDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001108 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$23.3M
The Self Regulation Model in BRCA 1/2 Genetic CounselingR03CA128459 · NCI · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI KELLY, KIMBERLY MICHELLE · 2008 to 2009
$150k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001108NCI NIH HHS R03 CA128459NCI NIH HHS R03 CA128459-01A2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer face decisions about screening (transvaginal ultrasound, CA125, mammography, breast exams) and proactive (before cancer) or reactive (after cancer) surgery (oophorectomy, mastectomy). The content of genetic counseling and its relation to these key health behaviors is largely unexamined. Ashkenazi Jewish women (n = 78) were surveyed through the process of genetic testing and had audiorecorded counseling sessions available for Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count analysis. Proportions for participant and counselor cognitive and affective content during sessions were used as primary predictor variables in linear mixed models for change in intentions for screening and treatment and in self-reported screening. Cognitive and affective content were important predictors of behavior. Counselor cognitive content was associated with ovarian screening. An interaction effect also emerged for CA-125, such that counselor cognitive content plus participant cognitive content or counselor affective content were associated with more screening. Teasing out the factors in risk communication that impact decision-making are critical, and affect from a risk communicator can spur action, such as cancer screening.

Indexed as

Genes, BRCA1Genetic CounselingGenetic TestingHealth BehaviorAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCounselingFemaleHumansJewsMammographyMastectomyMiddle AgedMutationOvarian NeoplasmsBRCA1BRCA2Cancer screeningGenetic counselingSurgery

Identifiers

PMID25533642
PMCPMC4478279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.