ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2016
How Did Medicare Part D Affect Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Drug Coverage?
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pharmaceutical policies: effects of regulating drug insurance schemes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- The Effect of Medicare Part D on Prescription Drug Spending and Health Care Use: 6 Years of Follow-up, 2007-2012.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the effect of Medicare Part D on racial/ethnic disparities in having any drug coverage and in sources of payment for drug expenditure.
methodsWe used nationally representative data on whites, African-Americans, and Hispanics aged 55 and older from the 2002-2009 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to analyze disparities in having any drug coverage and in sources of coverage for individuals aged 65 and older as compared with those for adults aged 55-63 without Medicare.
resultsThere was no disparity in the probability of drug coverage for African-American or Hispanic compared to white Medicare beneficiaries, before or after 2006. There were, however, differences in the sources of coverage. African-Americans and Hispanics over the age of 65 had lower rates of private coverage than whites. This disparity in private coverage was completely offset by minorities' higher rates of drug coverage through Medicaid before 2006 and through Part D since 2006. In contrast, among individuals aged 55-63, there are large and persistent disparities in the probability of having drug coverage throughout the period. DISCUSSION: Pronounced racial/ethnic disparities in drug coverage in the years just before Medicare eligibility are eliminated by access to public coverage at age 65. This was true even before the introduction of Part D.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.