Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25533302›Full record

SynthesisMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2015

A systematic review of the incidence and prevalence of cancer in multiple sclerosis.

Ruth Ann Marrie, Nadia Reider, Jeffrey Cohen, Olaf Stuve, Maria Trojano, Per Soelberg Sorensen, Stephen C Reingold, Gary Cutter

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frailty in multiple sclerosis: A scoping review.Multiple sclerosis and related disorders · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Ruth Ann MarrieDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada/Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada rmarrie@hsc.mb.ca.
Nadia ReiderDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Jeffrey CohenMellen Center for MS Treatment and Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Olaf StuveDepartment of Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
Maria TrojanoDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Italy.
Per Soelberg SorensenDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Stephen C ReingoldScientific and Clinical Review Associates, LLC, Salisbury, CT, USA.
Gary CutterDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
University of Manitoba · CACleveland Clinic · USRigshospitalet · DKThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies of cancer incidence and prevalence in multiple sclerosis (MS) have produced conflicting results.

objectiveTo estimate the incidence and prevalence of cancer in persons with MS and review the quality of included studies.

methodsWe searched the PUBMED, SCOPUS, Web of Knowledge, and EMBASE databases, conference proceedings, and reference lists of all articles retrieved. Abstracts were screened for relevance by two reviewers. Data from included articles were captured using a standardized form, and the abstraction was verified by a second reviewer. We assessed quality of the included studies. We quantitatively assessed studies using the I (2) statistic, and conducted meta-analyses for population-based studies.

resultsWe identified 38 studies. Estimates for incidence and prevalence varied substantially for most cancers. In population-based studies, cervical, breast, and digestive cancers had the highest incidence. The risk of meningiomas and urinary system cancers appeared higher than expected, while the risks of pancreatic, ovarian, prostate and testicular cancer were lower than expected.

conclusionThe complexity of understanding cancer risk in MS is augmented by inconsistencies in study design, and the relative paucity of age, sex and ethnicity-specific risk estimates from which the strong impact of age on the incidence of cancers can be assessed.

Indexed as

ComorbidityHumansIncidenceMultiple SclerosisNeoplasmsPrevalencecancercomorbidityincidenceMultiple sclerosisprevalencesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID25533302
PMCPMC4429168
OpenAlexW2143322657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.