Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25532895›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2015

Detecting regular sound changes in linguistics as events of concerted evolution.

Daniel J Hruschka, Simon Branford, Eric D Smith, Jon Wilkins, Andrew Meade, Mark Pagel, Tanmoy Bhattacharya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Phylogenetic insight into the origin of tones.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A global analysis of matches and mismatches between human genetic and linguistic histories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Cultural extinction in evolutionary perspective.Evolutionary human sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Support for linguistic macrofamilies from weighted sequence alignment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel J HruschkaSchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, PO Box 872402, Tempe, AZ 85287-2402, USA.
Simon BranfordSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6BX, UK.
Eric D SmithThe Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA; Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Mail Stop 2A1, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
Jon WilkinsThe Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA; Ronin Institute, 127 Haddon Place, Montclair, NJ 07043, USA.
Andrew MeadeSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6BX, UK.
Mark PagelSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6BX, UK; The Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA. Electronic address: m.pagel@reading.ac.uk.
Tanmoy BhattacharyaThe Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA; T-2, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA. Electronic address: tanmoy@santafe.edu.

Funding

European Research Council 268744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConcerted evolution is normally used to describe parallel changes at different sites in a genome, but it is also observed in languages where a specific phoneme changes to the same other phoneme in many words in the lexicon—a phenomenon known as regular sound change. We develop a general statistical model that can detect concerted changes in aligned sequence data and apply it to study regular sound changes in the Turkic language family.

resultsLinguistic evolution, unlike the genetic substitutional process, is dominated by events of concerted evolutionary change. Our model identified more than 70 historical events of regular sound change that occurred throughout the evolution of the Turkic language family, while simultaneously inferring a dated phylogenetic tree. Including regular sound changes yielded an approximately 4-fold improvement in the characterization of linguistic change over a simpler model of sporadic change, improved phylogenetic inference, and returned more reliable and plausible dates for events on the phylogenies. The historical timings of the concerted changes closely follow a Poisson process model, and the sound transition networks derived from our model mirror linguistic expectations.

conclusionsWe demonstrate that a model with no prior knowledge of complex concerted or regular changes can nevertheless infer the historical timings and genealogical placements of events of concerted change from the signals left in contemporary data. Our model can be applied wherever discrete elements—such as genes, words, cultural trends, technologies, or morphological traits—can change in parallel within an organism or other evolving group.

Indexed as

Cultural EvolutionPhoneticsHumansModels, StatisticalPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID25532895
PMCPMC4291143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.