Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25532826›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2015

US-Based Drug Cost Parameter Estimation for Economic Evaluations.

Joseph F Levy, Patrick D Meek, Marjorie A Rosenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Transparent and Consistent Approach to Assess US Outpatient Drug Costs for Use in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph F LevyUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Population Health Sciences, Madison, WI, USA (JFL)
Patrick D MeekAlbany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences Department of Pharmacy, Research Institute for Health Outcomes, Albany, NY, USA (PDM)
Marjorie A RosenbergUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Actuarial Science, Risk Management and Insurance and Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Madison, WI, USA (MAR)

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
THE ECONOMICS OF MENTAL HEALTHT32MH018029 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MULLAHY, JOHN · 1985 to 2016
$3.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCRR NIH HHS 1UL1RR025011NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025011NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018029NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH18029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the United States, more than 10% of national health expenditures are for prescription drugs. Assessing drug costs in US economic evaluation studies is not consistent, as the true acquisition cost of a drug is not known by decision modelers. Current US practice focuses on identifying one reasonable drug cost and imposing some distributional assumption to assess uncertainty.

methodsWe propose a set of Rules based on current pharmacy practice that account for the heterogeneity of drug product costs. The set of products derived from our Rules, and their associated costs, form an empirical distribution that can be used for more realistic sensitivity analyses and create transparency in drug cost parameter computation. The Rules specify an algorithmic process to select clinically equivalent drug products that reduce pill burden, use an appropriate package size, and assume uniform weighting of substitutable products. Three diverse examples show derived empirical distributions and are compared with previously reported cost estimates.

resultsThe shapes of the empirical distributions among the 3 drugs differ dramatically, including multiple modes and different variation. Previously published estimates differed from the means of the empirical distributions. Published ranges for sensitivity analyses did not cover the ranges of the empirical distributions. In one example using lisinopril, the empirical mean cost of substitutable products was $444 (range = $23-$953) as compared with a published estimate of $305 (range = $51-$523).

conclusionsOur Rules create a simple and transparent approach to creating cost estimates of drug products and assessing their variability. The approach is easily modified to include a subset of, or different weighting for, substitutable products. The derived empirical distribution is easily incorporated into 1-way or probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAlgorithmsCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug CostsDrug IndustryHumansLisinoprilNaproxenPrescription DrugsUnited StatesLisinoprilNaproxenPrescription Drugscost effectiveness analysisdrug costshealth technology assessmentsensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID25532826
PMCPMC4472562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.