Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25532487›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2014

A simplified method to recover urinary vesicles for clinical applications, and sample banking.

Luca Musante, Dorota Tataruch, Dongfeng Gu, Alberto Benito-Martin, Giulio Calzaferri, Sinead Aherne, Harry Holthofer

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Uromodulin and the study of urinary extracellular vesicles.Journal of extracellular biology · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Application of exosomes in tumor immunity: recent progresses.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Isolation and characterization of extracellular vesicles and future directions in diagnosis and therapy.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luca MusanteCentre for BioAnalytical Sciences (CBAS), Dublin City University, Republic of Ireland.
Dorota TataruchCentre for BioAnalytical Sciences (CBAS), Dublin City University, Republic of Ireland.
Dongfeng GuCentre for BioAnalytical Sciences (CBAS), Dublin City University, Republic of Ireland.
Alberto Benito-MartinCentre for BioAnalytical Sciences (CBAS), Dublin City University, Republic of Ireland.
Giulio CalzaferriCentre for BioAnalytical Sciences (CBAS), Dublin City University, Republic of Ireland.
Sinead AherneNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Republic of Ireland.
Harry HolthoferCentre for BioAnalytical Sciences (CBAS), Dublin City University, Republic of Ireland.
Dublin City University · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary extracellular vesicles provide a novel source for valuable biomarkers for kidney and urogenital diseases: Current isolation protocols include laborious, sequential centrifugation steps which hampers their widespread research and clinical use. Furthermore, large individual urine sample volumes or sizable target cohorts are to be processed (e.g. for biobanking), the storage capacity is an additional problem. Thus, alternative methods are necessary to overcome such limitations. We have developed a practical vesicle isolation technique to yield easily manageable sample volumes in an exceptionally cost efficient way to facilitate their full utilization in less privileged environments and maximize the benefit of biobanking. Urinary vesicles were isolated by hydrostatic dialysis with minimal interference of soluble proteins or vesicle loss. Large volumes of urine were concentrated up to 1/100 of original volume and the dialysis step allowed equalization of urine physico-chemical characteristics. Vesicle fractions were found suitable to any applications, including RNA analysis. In the yield, our hydrostatic filtration dialysis system outperforms the conventional ultracentrifugation-based methods and the labour intensive and potentially hazardous step of ultracentrifugations are eliminated. Likewise, the need for trained laboratory personnel and heavy initial investment is avoided. Thus, our method qualifies as a method for laboratories working with urinary vesicles and biobanking.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksCell-Derived MicroparticlesAdultFemaleGenital Diseases, FemaleGenital Diseases, MaleHumansMalePreservation, BiologicalUrologic Diseases

Identifiers

PMID25532487
PMCPMC4274508
OpenAlexW2063919942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.