Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25531808›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2014

Assessment of acceptability and usability of new delivery prototype device for intradermal vaccination in healthy subjects.

Timothi J S Van Mulder, Stijn Verwulgen, Koen C L Beyers, Linda Scheelen, Monique M Elseviers, Pierre Van Damme, Vanessa Vankerckhoven

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01963338 (A Randomized Controlled Study to Assess the Acceptability and Usability of New Delivery Device for Intradermal Vaccination in Healthy Volunteers), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01963338 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Study to Assess the Acceptability and Usability of New Delivery Device for Intradermal Vaccination in Healthy Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsorPierre Van DammeRan2012 to 2012Enrolled102ConditionsPain, Vaccination Adverse EventArmsIntradermal injection in the forearm (0,1cc NaCl 0,9%), Intradermal injection in the upper arm (0,1cc NaCl 0,9%), Intramuscular injection in the upper arm (0,5cc NaCl 0,9%)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Timothi J S Van Muldera Department of Nursing and Midwifery ; University of Antwerp; Campus Drie Eiken ; Wilrijk , Belgium.
Stijn Verwulgen
Koen C L Beyers
Linda Scheelen
Monique M Elseviers
Pierre Van Damme
Vanessa Vankerckhoven
University of Antwerp · BEArtesis Plantijn Hogeschool Antwerpen · BEProvince of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to assess the acceptability and usability of a newly developed intradermal prototype device, VAX-ID™, in healthy subjects. In April 2012 an investigational study was conducted in healthy subjects aged 18 to 65 y. To compare injection site and route of administration, subjects were allocated to 4 subgroups, either receiving subsequently 2 intradermal (ID) injections (one in the forearm and one in the deltoid) or an ID (forearm) and an intramuscular (IM) (deltoid) injection. All injections contained saline solution. Acceptability was assessed with a subjects' questionnaire and a daily electronic diary for 5 d. Usability was assessed with a vaccinators' questionnaire and an expert panel. A 10-point Visual Analog Scale was used to score several statements on usability and acceptability. A total of 102 healthy subjects were enrolled in the study (age: 19-63). No statistically significant differences were seen in demographic characteristics between the ID and IM groups. Anxiety before injection, pain during injection and duration of injection were rated significantly lower for ID compared to IM. One day after the injections, redness was reported more often after ID injection in the forearm versus ID in the deltoid; pain at injection site was reported significantly more often after IM vs. ID injection. The new VAX-ID prototype device was found easy to handle, easy to use and safe. The new VAX-ID prototype device was shown to have a high degree of acceptability as well as usability. Further studies with VAX-ID will be conducted using vaccine antigen allowing assessment of immunogenicity and safety. Additionally, these studies will help to further improve VAX-ID in terms of accuracy of delivered dose and feedback to the vaccinator. (NCT01963338).

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansInjections, IntradermalMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationVisual Analog Scaleinjection deviceintradermalvaccinationvaccine delivery

Identifiers

PMID25531808
PMCPMC4514056
OpenAlexW2052338984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.