Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25531691›Full record

ReviewChemical Society reviews2015

Soft fluorescent nanomaterials for biological and biomedical imaging.

Hong-Shang Peng, Daniel T Chiu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical Society reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A photo-controlled fluorescent switching based on carbon dots and photochromic diarylethene for bioimaging.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Brightness of fluorescent organic nanomaterials.Chemical Society reviews · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hong-Shang PengDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. chiu@chem.washington.edu.
Daniel T Chiu

Funding

Single-Cell Methods for Analysis of Clonal Heterogeneity and Evolution in CancerR01CA175215 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI RADICH, JERALD PATRICK · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
Ultra-Bright Probes with Ultra-Narrow Emission for Molecular and Cellular AnalysiR21CA186798 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CHIU, DANIEL T · 2014 to 2016
$672k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA175215NCI NIH HHS R01CA175215NCI NIH HHS R21 CA186798NCI NIH HHS R21CA186798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soft fluorescent nanomaterials have attracted recent attention as imaging agents for biological applications, because they provide the advantages of good biocompatibility, high brightness, and easy biofunctionalization. Here, we provide a survey of recent developments in fluorescent soft nano-sized biological imaging agents. Various soft fluorescent nanoparticles (NPs) (including dye-doped polymer NPs, semiconducting polymer NPs, small-molecule organic NPs, nanogels, micelles, vesicles, and biomaterial-based NPs) are summarized from the perspectives of preparation methods, structure, optical properties, and surface functionalization. Based on both optical and functional properties of the nano-sized imaging agents, their applications are then reviewed in terms of in vitro imaging, in vivo imaging, and cellular-process imaging, by means of specific or nonspecific targeting.

Indexed as

Fluorescent DyesNanostructuresOptical ImagingSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredAnimalsCell LineFemaleHumansMiceMice, NudeParticle SizeFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID25531691
PMCPMC4476966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.