Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25531688›Full record

ReviewNeurodegenerative disease management2014

Collaborative transdisciplinary team approach for dementia care.

James E Galvin, Licet Valois, Yael Zweig

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurodegenerative disease management, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A systematic review of interventions for persons living with dementia: The Geriatric ED Guidelines 2.0.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James E GalvinCenter for Cognitive Neurology & Alzheimer Disease Center, Departments of Neurology, Psychiatry, & Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Licet Valois
Yael Zweig

Funding

PSYCHOSOCIAL COREP30AG008051 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MITTELMAN, MARY SHERMAN · 1990 to 2019
$36.1M
Multicultural Community Dementia Screening.R01AG040211 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GALVIN, JAMES E · 2011 to 2018
$3.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG008051NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) has high economic impact and places significant burden on patients, caregivers, providers and healthcare delivery systems, fostering the need for an evaluation of alternative approaches to healthcare delivery for dementia. Collaborative care models are team-based, multicomponent interventions that provide a pragmatic strategy to deliver integrated healthcare to patients and families across a wide range of populations and clinical settings. Healthcare reform and national plans for AD goals to integrate quality care, health promotion and preventive services, and reduce the impact of disease on patients and families reinforcing the need for a system-level evaluation of how to best meet the needs of patients and families. We review collaborative care models for AD and offer evidence for improved patient- and family-centered outcomes, quality indicators of care and potential cost savings.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorPatient Care PlanningAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseCaregiversFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeAlzheimer's diseasecaregiver-centered outcomescollaborative caredementiamodels of careneurocognitive disorderspatient-centered outcomestransdisciplinary teams

Identifiers

PMID25531688
PMCPMC4308691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.