Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25531107›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Perception of binaural cues develops in children who are deaf through bilateral cochlear implantation.

Karen A Gordon, Michael R Deighton, Parvaneh Abbasalipour, Blake C Papsin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pulse timing dominates binaural hearing with cochlear implants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Binaural fusion: Complexities in definition and measurement.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The influence of auditory selective attention on linguistic outcomes in deaf and hard of hearing children with cochlear implants.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Early Bimodal Stimulation Benefits Language Acquisition for Children With Cochlear Implants.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karen A GordonArchie's Cochlear Implant Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael R DeightonArchie's Cochlear Implant Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Parvaneh AbbasalipourArchie's Cochlear Implant Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Blake C PapsinArchie's Cochlear Implant Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are significant challenges to restoring binaural hearing to children who have been deaf from an early age. The uncoordinated and poor temporal information available from cochlear implants distorts perception of interaural timing differences normally important for sound localization and listening in noise. Moreover, binaural development can be compromised by bilateral and unilateral auditory deprivation. Here, we studied perception of both interaural level and timing differences in 79 children/adolescents using bilateral cochlear implants and 16 peers with normal hearing. They were asked on which side of their head they heard unilaterally or bilaterally presented click- or electrical pulse- trains. Interaural level cues were identified by most participants including adolescents with long periods of unilateral cochlear implant use and little bilateral implant experience. Interaural timing cues were not detected by new bilateral adolescent users, consistent with previous evidence. Evidence of binaural timing detection was, for the first time, found in children who had much longer implant experience but it was marked by poorer than normal sensitivity and abnormally strong dependence on current level differences between implants. In addition, children with prior unilateral implant use showed a higher proportion of responses to their first implanted sides than children implanted simultaneously. These data indicate that there are functional repercussions of developing binaural hearing through bilateral cochlear implants, particularly when provided sequentially; nonetheless, children have an opportunity to use these devices to hear better in noise and gain spatial hearing.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationAdolescentChildCuesElectric StimulationHearing Loss, BilateralHumansPerceptionPersons with Hearing Disabilities

Identifiers

PMID25531107
PMCPMC4273969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.