Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25530913›Full record

ArticleJournal of biometrics & biostatistics2014

Analysis of Multivariate Disease Classification Data in the Presence of Partially Missing Disease Traits.

Jingang Miao, Samiran Sinha, Suojin Wang, W Ryan Diver, Susan M Gapstur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biometrics & biostatistics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jingang MiaoDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Samiran SinhaDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Suojin WangDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
W Ryan DiverEpidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Inc. Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Susan M GapsturEpidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Inc. Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.

Funding

Innovative approaches for analyzing SEER breast cancer dataR03CA176760 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI SINHA, SAMIRAN · 2013 to 2014
$154k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA176760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In modern cancer epidemiology, diseases are classified based on pathologic and molecular traits, and different combinations of these traits give rise to many disease subtypes. The effect of predictor variables can be measured by fitting a polytomous logistic model to such data. The differences (heterogeneity) among the relative risk parameters associated with subtypes are of great interest to better understand disease etiology. Due to the heterogeneity of the relative risk parameters, when a risk factor is changed, the prevalence of one subtype may change more than that of another subtype does. Estimation of the heterogeneity parameters is difficult when disease trait information is only partially observed and the number of disease subtypes is large. We consider a robust semiparametric approach based on the pseudo-conditional likelihood for estimating these heterogeneity parameters. Through simulation studies, we compare the robustness and efficiency of our approach with that of the maximum likelihood approach. The method is then applied to analyze the associations of weight gain with risk of breast cancer subtypes using data from the American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort.

Indexed as

Dimension reductionDisease classificationEstimating equationsEtiologic heterogeneityMissing disease traitPolytomous logistic model

Identifiers

PMID25530913
PMCPMC4270282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.