Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25530829›Full record

ArticleSocial psychological and personality science2014

Subjective and Objective Hierarchies and Their Relations to Psychological Well-Being: A U.S/Japan Comparison.

Katherine B Curhan, Cynthia S Levine, Hazel Rose Markus, Shinobu Kitayama, Jiyoung Park, Mayumi Karasawa, Norito Kawakami, Gayle D Love, Christopher L Coe, Yuri Miyamoto and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychological and personality science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Culture and Health: Recent Developments and Future Directions.The Japanese psychological research · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Gender and Psychological Well-Being.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Katherine B CurhanStanford University.
Cynthia S LevineStanford University.
Hazel Rose MarkusStanford University.
Shinobu KitayamaUniversity of Michigan.
Jiyoung ParkUniversity of Michigan.
Mayumi KarasawaTokyo Woman's Christian University.
Norito KawakamiUniversity of Tokyo.
Gayle D LoveUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison.
Christopher L CoeUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison.
Yuri MiyamotoUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison.
Carol D RyffUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison.

Funding

STATISTICS COREP01AG020166 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RYFF, CAROL D. · 2002 to 2015
$50.6M
Midlife Health in Japan (MIDJA) and the U.S. (MIDUS)R37AG027343 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RYFF, CAROL D. · 2007 to 2016
$5.9M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG020166NIA NIH HHS R37 AG027343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hierarchy can be conceptualized as objective social status (e.g., education level) or subjective social status (i.e., one's own judgment of one's status). Both forms predict well-being. This is the first investigation of the relative strength of these hierarchy-well-being relationships in the U.S. and Japan, cultural contexts with different normative ideas about how social status is understood and conferred. In probability samples of Japanese (N=1027) and U.S. (N=1805) adults,

Indexed as

Culture and SelfCulture/EthnicityEmotionInterdependenceSocial StatusWell-being

Identifiers

PMID25530829
PMCPMC4266948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.