Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25530306›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2015

Anger self-management in chronic traumatic brain injury: protocol for a psycho-educational treatment with a structurally equivalent control and an evaluation of treatment enactment.

Tessa Hart, Jo Ann Brockway, Jesse R Fann, Roland D Maiuro, Monica J Vaccaro

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tessa HartMoss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: thart@einstein.edu.
Jo Ann BrockwayDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jesse R FannDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Roland D MaiuroSeattle Anger Management and Domestic Violence Programs, Seattle, WA, USA.
Monica J VaccaroMoss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA.
Moss Rehabilitation Hospital · USUniversity of Washington · USBehavioral Tech Research, Inc. · US

Funding

Anger Self-Management in Post-Acute Traumatic Brain Injury: Clinic TrialR01HD061400 · NICHD · ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK · PI HART, TESSA · 2011 to 2015
$2.1M
NICHD NIH HHS 1R01HD061400NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anger and irritability are important and persistent clinical problems following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Treatment options include medications, behavioral modification, and psychotherapies, but some are impractical and none have proven efficacy with this population. We describe a randomized multi-center clinical trial testing a novel, one-on-one, 8-session psychoeducational treatment program, Anger Self-Management Training (ASMT), designed specifically for people with TBI who have significant cognitive impairment. The trial is notable for its use of a structurally equivalent comparison treatment, called Personal Readjustment and Education (PRE), which was created for the study and is intended to maximize equipoise for both participants and treaters. Fidelity assessment is conducted in real time and used in therapist supervision sessions. The primary outcome is change in self-reported anger on validated measures from pre-treatment to 1 week after the final session. Secondary outcomes include participant anger as reported by a significant other; emotional distress in domains other than anger/irritability; behavioral functioning; and quality of life. An interim assessment after the 4th session will allow examination of the trajectory of any observed treatment effects, and a follow-up assessment 2 months after the end of intervention will allow examination of persistence of effects. A treatment enactment phase, in which participants are interviewed several months after the last therapy session, is designed to provide qualitative data on whether and to what extent the principles and techniques learned in treatment are still carried out in daily life.

Indexed as

AngerAdolescentAdultAgedBrain InjuriesChronic DiseaseCognition DisordersCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeResearch DesignYoung AdultAnger managementBrain injuriesProblem solvingPsychological treatment

Identifiers

PMID25530306
PMCPMC4314341
OpenAlexW2041332391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.