Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25529755›Full record

ReviewParasitology2015

Sexual reproduction and genetic exchange in parasitic protists.

Gareth D Weedall, Neil Hall

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasitology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Taxonomy of the GenusPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Cryptic Sex inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Assessing Species Delimitation inMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  5. Towards an evolutionary baseline model ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Genomic divergence across the tree of life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Life in plastic, it's fantastic! HowFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gareth D WeedallInstitute of Integrative Biology,Biosciences Building, Crown Street,University of Liverpool,Liverpool L69 7ZB,UK.
Neil HallInstitute of Integrative Biology,Biosciences Building, Crown Street,University of Liverpool,Liverpool L69 7ZB,UK.
University of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Medical Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key part of the life cycle of an organism is reproduction. For a number of important protist parasites that cause human and animal disease, their sexuality has been a topic of debate for many years. Traditionally, protists were considered to be primitive relatives of the 'higher' eukaryotes, which may have diverged prior to the evolution of sex and to reproduce by binary fission. More recent views of eukaryotic evolution suggest that sex, and meiosis, evolved early, possibly in the common ancestor of all eukaryotes. However, detecting sex in these parasites is not straightforward. Recent advances, particularly in genome sequencing technology, have allowed new insights into parasite reproduction. Here, we review the evidence on reproduction in parasitic protists. We discuss protist reproduction in the light of parasitic life cycles and routes of transmission among hosts.

Indexed as

Life Cycle StagesAnimalsBiological EvolutionEukaryotaGenomeHumansMeiosisParasitesParasitic DiseasesReproductionmeiosis

Identifiers

PMID25529755
PMCPMC4413856
OpenAlexW2138753876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.