Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25529751›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2015

Multicenter analysis of soluble Axl reveals diagnostic value for very early stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

Patrick Reichl, Meng Fang, Patrick Starlinger, Katharina Staufer, Rudolf Nenutil, Petr Muller, Kristina Greplova, Dalibor Valik, Steven Dooley, Christine Brostjan and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. AXL in cancer: a modulator of drug resistance and therapeutic target.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Patrick Reichl *Department of Medicine I, Division: Institute of Cancer Research, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Meng Fang *Department of Laboratory Medicine, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Patrick StarlingerDepartment of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Katharina StauferDepartment of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Rudolf NenutilDepartment of Pathology and Department of Laboratory Medicine, BBMRI Biobanking Unit, and Regional Centre for Applied Molecular Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Petr MullerDepartment of Pathology and Department of Laboratory Medicine, BBMRI Biobanking Unit, and Regional Centre for Applied Molecular Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Kristina GreplovaDepartment of Pathology and Department of Laboratory Medicine, BBMRI Biobanking Unit, and Regional Centre for Applied Molecular Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Dalibor ValikDepartment of Pathology and Department of Laboratory Medicine, BBMRI Biobanking Unit, and Regional Centre for Applied Molecular Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Steven DooleyDepartment of Medicine II, Section Molecular Hepatology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Christine BrostjanDepartment of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas GruenbergerDepartment of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Jiayun ShenInstitute of Digestive Disease and the Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, CUHK Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong SAR, China.
Kwan ManDepartment of Surgery, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong SAR, China.
Michael TraunerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jun YuInstitute of Digestive Disease and the Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, CUHK Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong SAR, China.
Chun Fang GaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Wolfgang MikulitsDepartment of Medicine I, Division: Institute of Cancer Research, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATMasaryk Memorial Cancer Institute · CZChinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen · CNComprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · ATEastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital · CNHeidelberg University · DESecond Military Medical University · CNUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 25356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

If diagnosed at early stages, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can receive curative therapies, whereas therapeutic options at later stages are very limited. Here, we addressed the potential of soluble Axl (sAxl) as a biomarker of early HCC by analyzing levels of sAxl in 311 HCC and 237 control serum samples from centers in Europe and China. Serum concentrations of sAxl were significantly increased in HCC (18.575 ng/mL) as compared to healthy (13.388 ng/mL) or cirrhotic (12.169 ng/mL) controls. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of sAxl in very early stage HCC patients (BCLC 0) showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.848, with a sensitivity of 76.9% and a specificity of 69.2%. α-Fetoprotein (AFP)-negative HCC patients displayed an AUC of 0.803, with sensitivity and specificity of 73% and 70.8%. Combination of sAxl and AFP improved diagnostic accuracy to 0.936 in very early HCC patients and to 0.937 in all HCC. Differential diagnosis of very early HCC versus liver cirrhosis showed a combined performance for sAxl and AFP of 0.901 with a sensitivity of 88.5% and a specificity of 76.7%. Furthermore, sAxl levels failed to be elevated in primary ovarian, colorectal and breast carcinomas as well as in secondary hepatic malignancies derived from colon. In summary, sAxl outperforms AFP in detecting very early HCC as compared to healthy or cirrhotic controls and shows high diagnostic accuracy for AFP-negative patients. sAxl is specific for HCC and suggested as a biomarker for routine clinical use.

Indexed as

alpha-FetoproteinsAxl Receptor Tyrosine KinaseBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell Line, TumorDiagnosis, DifferentialEarly DiagnosisEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHep G2 CellsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLiver CirrhosisLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle Agedalpha-FetoproteinsAXL protein, humanAxl Receptor Tyrosine KinaseBiomarkers, TumorProto-Oncogene ProteinsReceptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinasesbiomarkerhepatocellular carcinomasoluble Axlα-fetoprotein

Identifiers

PMID25529751
PMCPMC4450342
OpenAlexW1590094217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.